OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to design a vectorcardiographic lead system dedicated to the analysis of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Body surface potentials during AF were simulated by using a biophysical model of the human atria and thorax. The XYZ components of the equivalent dipole were derived from the Gabor-Nelson equations. These served as the gold standard while searching for an optimal orthogonal lead system for the estimation of the heart vector while using a limited number of electrode positions. Six electrode configurations and their dedicated transfer matrices were tested by using 10 different episodes of simulated AF and 25 different thorax geometries. RESULTS: Root-mean-square-based relative estimation error of the vectorcardiogram using the Frank electrodes was 0.39. An adaptation of 4 of the 9 electrode locations of the standard electrocardiogram, with 1 electrode moved to the back, reduced the error to 0.24. CONCLUSION: The Frank lead system is suboptimal for estimating the equivalent dipole components (VCG) during AF. Alternative electrode configurations should include at least 1 electrode on the back.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to design a vectorcardiographic lead system dedicated to the analysis of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Body surface potentials during AF were simulated by using a biophysical model of the human atria and thorax. The XYZ components of the equivalent dipole were derived from the Gabor-Nelson equations. These served as the gold standard while searching for an optimal orthogonal lead system for the estimation of the heart vector while using a limited number of electrode positions. Six electrode configurations and their dedicated transfer matrices were tested by using 10 different episodes of simulated AF and 25 different thorax geometries. RESULTS: Root-mean-square-based relative estimation error of the vectorcardiogram using the Frank electrodes was 0.39. An adaptation of 4 of the 9 electrode locations of the standard electrocardiogram, with 1 electrode moved to the back, reduced the error to 0.24. CONCLUSION: The Frank lead system is suboptimal for estimating the equivalent dipole components (VCG) during AF. Alternative electrode configurations should include at least 1 electrode on the back.