Literature DB >> 17027816

Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensive patients.

Sante D Pierdomenico1, Domenico Lapenna, Roberta Di Tommaso, Silvio Di Carlo, Anna L Esposito, Rocco Di Mascio, Enzo Ballone, Franco Cuccurullo, Andrea Mezzetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The independent prognostic value of blood pressure (BP) variability in treated hypertension is not yet clear. We investigated the relationship between BP variability, evaluated by noninvasive monitoring, and cardiovascular outcome in treated hypertensive patients.
METHODS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 1472 treated patients. Subjects with the standard deviation of daytime or night-time systolic BP below or above the median of the population were classified as having low or high BP variability. Specifically, 738 and 734 patients had low and high daytime BP variability, respectively, and 739 and 733 subjects had low and high night-time BP variability, respectively.
RESULTS: During follow-up (4.88 +/- 2.9 years, range 0.2-11.6 years) there were 119 events. The event rates per 100 patient-years in subjects with low and high BP variability according to daytime BP were 1.18 and 2.01, respectively, and in those with low and high BP variability according to night-time BP were 1.2 and 2.05, respectively. Event-free survival was significantly different between the low and high BP variability groups (P = .006 for both daytime and night-time BP). However, after adjustment for other covariates in a Cox multivariate analysis, the adverse prognostic relevance of high BP variability was no longer detectable, whereas age, smoking habit, LDL cholesterol, diabetes, previous events, LV hypertrophy, and daytime or night-time systolic BP resulted independent predictors of risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased BP variability is associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular events, but also with other relevant prognostic factors. Indeed, in multivariate analysis the possible adverse prognostic impact of BP variability is no longer evident. Thus, in treated hypertension, BP variability evaluated by noninvasive monitoring is not an independent predictor of outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027816     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  17 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular risk stratification and blood pressure variability on ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  José Boggia; Kei Asayama; Yan Li; Tine Willum Hansen; Luis Mena; Rudolph Schutte
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to guide hypertensive therapy.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Eugenia Gianos; Arthur Schwartzbard; Henry Black; Howard Weintraub
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-12

3.  Redefined blood pressure variability measure and its association with mortality in elderly primary care patients.

Authors:  Sujuan Gao; Hugh C Hendrie; Chenkun Wang; Timothy E Stump; Jesse C Stewart; Joe Kesterson; Daniel O Clark; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Average real variability of 24-h systolic blood pressure is associated with microalbuminuria in patients with primary hypertension.

Authors:  G Mulè; I Calcaterra; M Costanzo; M Morreale; F D'Ignoto; A Castiglia; G Geraci; G Rabbiolo; F Vaccaro; S Cottone
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Echocardiographic abnormalities in familial dysautonomia.

Authors:  Udi Nussinovitch; Uriel Katz; Moshe Nussinovitch; Leonard Blieden; Naomi Nussinovitch
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Within-visit variability of blood pressure and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Emily B Levitan; Kristi Reynolds; Devin M Mann; Marcello Tonelli; Suzanne Oparil; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Relationship Between Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Subclinical Renal Damage in Essential Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mulè; Ilenia Calcaterra; Miriam Costanzo; Giulio Geraci; Laura Guarino; Anna C Foraci; Maria G Vario; Giovanni Cerasola; Santina Cottone
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Increased nitric oxide and attenuated diastolic blood pressure variability in african americans with mildly impaired renal function.

Authors:  Keith M Diaz; Deborah L Feairheller; Kathleen M Sturgeon; Praveen Veerabhadrappa; Sheara T Williamson; Deborah L Crabbe; Michael D Brown
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 2.420

9.  Within-subject blood pressure level--not variability--predicts fatal and nonfatal outcomes in a general population.

Authors:  Rudolph Schutte; Lutgarde Thijs; Yan-Ping Liu; Kei Asayama; Yu Jin; Augustine Odili; Yu-Mei Gu; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Lotte Jacobs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Blood pressure variability and morning blood pressure surge in elderly Chinese hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Xiaobo Qin; Qin Zhang; Suping Yang; Zhongbo Sun; Xiaojie Chen; Huiling Huang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.