Literature DB >> 17027404

Evaluation of residual rotator cuff defects after in vivo single- versus double-row rotator cuff repairs.

Paul C Brady1, Paolo Arrigoni, Stephen S Burkhart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery has advanced, new techniques have emerged to maximize the biomechanical strength of the repair construct. The double-row repair has been recommended as a means of increasing the contact area of the repaired rotator cuff to the native bone bed. This study attempts to sequentially examine and measure the rotator cuff footprint (in vivo) before cuff repair, after an initial lateral-row repair (before the medial-row sutures are tied), and finally, after the double-row repair. In this way, the rotator cuff footprint of single- and double-row repairs can be quantified and compared.
METHODS: Between October 2004 and February 2005, 26 patients were enrolled in the study. These patients had rotator cuff tears that were amenable to double-row repair by means of performing the lateral-row repair before the medial-row repair. After preparation of the greater tuberosity footprint, the native footprint was measured in the medial-to-lateral direction. Next, the medial-row anchors and sutures were passed through the cuff (but not tied), and then the lateral row was secured via suture anchors and the arthroscope was reinserted into the intra-articular space. A depth gauge was introduced through the repaired cuff (lateral row only), and the residual bare footprint was measured. The medial row was then tied, and the cuff was again visualized from the intra-articular position to measure any remaining bare footprint.
RESULTS: The mean footprint measured 17.0 +/- 1.9 mm from medial to lateral. After repair of the lateral row, the mean residual uncovered footprint measured 9.0 +/- 2.0 mm. This constituted a 52.7% +/- 9.2% uncovered area after a single lateral-row repair. After the medial row was secured, there were no remaining residual deficits of the cuff footprint.
CONCLUSIONS: After an isolated lateral-row repair, 52.7% +/- 9.2% of the rotator cuff footprint remains uncovered. On average, the double-row repair offered over twice the footprint coverage yielded by a single-row repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The arthroscopic shoulder surgeon should be aware of the enhanced footprint coverage offered by double-row rotator cuff fixation as opposed to single-row rotator cuff fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027404     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  22 in total

Review 1.  Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome?

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Christian Gerhardt; Jianhai Chen; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Primary stability of rotator cuff repair: can more suture materials yield more strength?

Authors:  Mehmet Gülecyüz; Hannes Bortolotti; Matthias Pietschmann; Andreas Ficklscherer; Thomas Niethammer; Björn Roßbach; Peter Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Arthroscopic footprint reconstruction of bursal-side delaminated rotator cuff tears using the suture-bridge technique.

Authors:  Kyung-Cheon Kim; Kwang-Jin Rhee; Hyun-Dae Shin; Pil-Sung Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Revision of a pull-out suture anchor in the lateral row during the suture-bridge technique: technical note.

Authors:  Kyung-Cheon Kim; Kwang-Jin Rhee; Hyun-Dae Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Ignacio Carbonel; Angel Antonio Martinez; Angel Calvo; Jorge Ripalda; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Contact area and pressure in suture bridge rotator cuff repair using knotless lateral anchors.

Authors:  Marc Tompkins; Keith O Monchik; Matthew J Plante; Braden C Fleming; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Clinico-radiological evaluation of retear rate in arthroscopic double row versus single row repair technique in full thickness rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Roshan Wade; Sameer Salgar
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-05-03

8.  In vivo blood flow after rotator cuff reconstruction in a sheep model: comparison of single versus double row.

Authors:  Dennis Liem; Nicolas J Dedy; Gregor Hauschild; Georg Gosheger; Shirin Meier; Maurice Balke; Hans-Ulrich Spiegel; Bjoern Marquardt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The Combined "Double-Pulley" Simple Knot Technique for Arthroscopic Transtendon Fixation of Partial Articular-Sided Tear of the Subscapularis Tendon.

Authors:  Nata Parnes; Paul Carey; Mario Ciani; Monica Morman
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 10.  [Arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery : New and established methods].

Authors:  S Pauly; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.