Literature DB >> 17023577

Molecular relapse in adult standard-risk ALL patients detected by prospective MRD monitoring during and after maintenance treatment: data from the GMALL 06/99 and 07/03 trials.

Thorsten Raff1, Nicola Gökbuget, Silke Lüschen, Regina Reutzel, Matthias Ritgen, Sebastian Irmer, Sebastian Böttcher, Heinz-August Horst, Michael Kneba, Dieter Hoelzer, Monika Brüggemann.   

Abstract

Although levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) decrease below the detection limit in most adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after consolidation treatment, about 30% of these patients will ultimately relapse. To evaluate the power of MRD monitoring as an indicator of impending relapse, we prospectively analyzed postconsolidation samples of 105 patients enrolled in the German Multicenter ALL (GMALL) trial by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of clonal immune gene rearrangements. All patients were in hematologic remission, had completed first-year polychemotherapy, and tested MRD negative prior to study entry. Twenty-eight of 105 patients (27%) converted to MRD positivity thereafter, and 17 of 28 (61%) relapsed so far. Median time from molecular (MRD-positive) to clinical relapse was 9.5 months. In 15 of these patients, MRD within the quantitative range of PCR was measured in hematologic remission, and 13 of these patients (89%) relapsed after a median interval of 4.1 months. Of the 77 continuously MRD-negative patients, only 5 (6%) have relapsed. We conclude that conversion to MRD positivity during the early postconsolidation phase in adult standard-risk ALL patients is highly predictive of subsequent hematologic relapse. As a result of the study, as of spring 2006, salvage treatment in the ongoing GMALL trial is intended to be started at the time of recurrence of quantifiable MRD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17023577     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-037093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  66 in total

1.  World Bispecific Antibody Summit, September 27-28, 2011, Boston, MA.

Authors:  Eugen Dhimolea; Janice M Reichert
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  FZR1 loss increases sensitivity to DNA damage and consequently promotes murine and human B-cell acute leukemia.

Authors:  Jo Ishizawa; Eiji Sugihara; Shinji Kuninaka; Kaoru Mogushi; Kensuke Kojima; Christopher B Benton; Ran Zhao; Dhruv Chachad; Norisato Hashimoto; Rodrigo O Jacamo; Yihua Qiu; Suk Young Yoo; Shinichiro Okamoto; Michael Andreeff; Steven M Kornblau; Hideyuki Saya
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  CD56 expression in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with non-thymic phenotype and resistance to induction therapy but no inferior survival after risk-adapted therapy.

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Nicola Gökbuget; Stefan Schwartz; Thomas Burmeister; Harald Rieder; Monika Brüggemann; Dieter Hoelzer; Eckhard Thiel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Malleable immunoglobulin genes and hematopathology - the good, the bad, and the ugly: a paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology.

Authors:  Adam Bagg
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  New markers for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Guangchun Song; Christopher Clark; Laura Key; Peixin Liu; Mohammad Mehrpooya; Patricia Stow; Xiaoping Su; Sheila Shurtleff; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Blinatumomab for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The First Bispecific T-Cell Engager Antibody to Be Approved by the EMA for Minimal Residual Disease.

Authors:  Sahra Ali; Alexandre Moreau; Daniela Melchiorri; Jorge Camarero; Filip Josephson; Odoardo Olimpier; Jonas Bergh; Dominik Karres; Kyriaki Tzogani; Christian Gisselbrecht; Francesco Pignatti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-14

Review 8.  T cell-engaging therapies - BiTEs and beyond.

Authors:  Maria-Elisabeth Goebeler; Ralf C Bargou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Michael J Borowitz; Meenakshi Devidas; Stephen P Hunger; W Paul Bowman; Andrew J Carroll; William L Carroll; Stephen Linda; Paul L Martin; D Jeanette Pullen; David Viswanatha; Cheryl L Willman; Naomi Winick; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  GvL effects in T-prolymphocytic leukemia: evidence from MRD kinetics and TCR repertoire analyses.

Authors:  L Sellner; M Brüggemann; M Schlitt; H Knecht; D Herrmann; T Reigl; A Krejci; V Bystry; N Darzentas; M Rieger; S Dietrich; T Luft; A D Ho; M Kneba; P Dreger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.