OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reliability of 3 wound measurement techniques, including linear and 2 electronic techniques--Visitrak and the VeV MD system. DESIGN: Repeated measures involving forty 2-dimensional "wounds" with a range of clinically relevant sizes were created using regular paper. Blinded observers measured the surface areas of wounds in 2 sessions, using 3 techniques. SETTING: Research department of a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Four blinded observers. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mixed linear models were fitted to determine interobserver and intraobserver variability. The average root mean square error (RMSE) for each measurement technique was determined to investigate the accuracy. RESULTS: Intraobserver variation was not significant in most measurement techniques. Interobserver variation was significant for all techniques. Linear measurements showed the highest RMSE, whereas VeV and Visitrak were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of repeated wound measurements for all techniques can be achieved only with the same observer. Linear measurement has the least accuracy in evaluating wound size, VeV is slightly better than Visitrak for large wounds, and Visitrak is slightly better than VeV for small wounds. Our study shows that the use of electronic devices is superior to manual techniques to achieve valid measurements of wound area.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reliability of 3 wound measurement techniques, including linear and 2 electronic techniques--Visitrak and the VeV MD system. DESIGN: Repeated measures involving forty 2-dimensional "wounds" with a range of clinically relevant sizes were created using regular paper. Blinded observers measured the surface areas of wounds in 2 sessions, using 3 techniques. SETTING: Research department of a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Four blinded observers. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mixed linear models were fitted to determine interobserver and intraobserver variability. The average root mean square error (RMSE) for each measurement technique was determined to investigate the accuracy. RESULTS: Intraobserver variation was not significant in most measurement techniques. Interobserver variation was significant for all techniques. Linear measurements showed the highest RMSE, whereas VeV and Visitrak were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of repeated wound measurements for all techniques can be achieved only with the same observer. Linear measurement has the least accuracy in evaluating wound size, VeV is slightly better than Visitrak for large wounds, and Visitrak is slightly better than VeV for small wounds. Our study shows that the use of electronic devices is superior to manual techniques to achieve valid measurements of wound area.
Authors: Susan S Thomason; Stephen L Luther; Gail M Powell-Cope; Jeffrey J Harrow; Polly Palacios Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Ralph S DaCosta; Iris Kulbatski; Liis Lindvere-Teene; Danielle Starr; Kristina Blackmore; Jason I Silver; Julie Opoku; Yichao Charlie Wu; Philip J Medeiros; Wei Xu; Lizhen Xu; Brian C Wilson; Cheryl Rosen; Ron Linden Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sheila C Wang; John A E Anderson; Robyn Evans; Kevin Woo; Benjamin Beland; Denis Sasseville; Linda Moreau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240