Literature DB >> 17023231

Pharmacokinetic profile of controlled-release carvedilol in patients with left ventricular dysfunction associated with chronic heart failure or after myocardial infarction.

Milton Packer1, Mary Ann Lukas, David M Tenero, Charlotte A Baidoo, Barry H Greenberg.   

Abstract

We compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of repeated dosing with the currently available immediate-release (IR) carvedilol (given twice daily) and a newly developed controlled-release (CR) formulation (given once daily) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). We enrolled 188 patients with stable mild, moderate, or severe heart failure as well as survivors of a recent acute myocardial infarction (MI) with asymptomatic LVD (left ventricular ejection fraction </=0.40) in a crossover study. PK variables were initially assessed after patients had received carvedilol IR 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, or 25 mg twice daily for >/=2 weeks. Patients were then switched to the corresponding dose of carvedilol CR (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg once daily), and PK variables were reassessed after an additional 2 weeks. The primary measures included trough plasma concentration (C(tau)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC([0-t])) for both enantiomers of carvedilol of each formulation of the drug. The AUC((0-t)) and the trough and maximum carvedilol concentrations for both the R(+) and S(-) enantiomers were similar when carvedilol IR was compared with carvedilol CR as follows: 3.125 mg twice daily versus 10 mg once daily, 6.25 mg twice daily versus 20 mg once daily, 12.5 mg twice daily versus 40 mg once daily, and 25 mg twice daily versus 80 mg once daily, respectively. Based on a pooled analysis, the AUC((0-t)), C(max), and C(tau) for both R(+) and S(-) were equivalent for the CR and IR formulations, with point estimates and 90% confidence intervals within the bioequivalence limits of 80%-125%. The fluctuation index (the CR-IR ratio for [C(max) - C(min)]/C(ss) where C(min) is the minimum observed concentration over the dosing interval and C(ss) is the concentration at steady state) for both R(+)- and S(-)-carvedilol was approximately 1, indicating that the peak-to-trough fluctuation in plasma concentration for carvedilol after use of carvedilol CR once daily was similar to that for carvedilol IR given twice daily. The median time to maximum observed plasma concentration (t(max)) was approximately 3 hours longer for both enantiomers after administration of carvedilol CR as compared with carvedilol IR. These data demonstrate that the new carvedilol CR formulation given once daily is equivalent to the currently available carvedilol IR formulation given twice daily in patients with heart failure and asymptomatic post-MI LVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17023231     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Predicting pharmacokinetic stability by multiple oral administration of atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  Akihide Wakamatsu; Kazuo Aoki; Yojiro Sakiyama; Takashi Ohnishi; Makoto Sugita
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-03

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs in patients with heart failure: an update (part 2, drugs administered orally).

Authors:  Ryuichi Ogawa; Joan M Stachnik; Hirotoshi Echizen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Optimal use of beta-blockers in high-risk hypertension: a guide to dosing equivalence.

Authors:  Janet B McGill
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-06-01

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of S(-)-carvedilol in healthy volunteers after administration of the immediate-release (IR) and the new controlled-release (CR) dosage forms of the racemate.

Authors:  Ahmed A Othman; David M Tenero; Duane A Boyle; Natalie D Eddington; Michael J Fossler
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  CYP2D6 is a major determinant of metoprolol disposition and effects in hospitalized Russian patients treated for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ksenia Goryachkina; Aleksandra Burbello; Svetlana Boldueva; Svetlana Babak; Ulf Bergman; Leif Bertilsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Dose proportionality and pharmacokinetics of carvedilol sustained-release formulation: a single dose-ascending 10-sequence incomplete block study.

Authors:  Yo Han Kim; Hee Youn Choi; Yook-Hwan Noh; Shi Hyang Lee; Hyeong-Seok Lim; Chin Kim; Kyun-Seop Bae
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Assessment of clinical effect and treatment quality of immediate-release carvedilol-IR versus SLOW release carvedilol-SR in Heart Failure patients (SLOW-HF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dong-Ju Choi; Chan Soon Park; Jin Joo Park; Hae-Young Lee; Seok-Min Kang; Byung-Su Yoo; Eun-Seok Jeon; Seok Keun Hong; Joon-Han Shin; Myung-A Kim; Dae-Gyun Park; Eung-Ju Kim; Soon-Jun Hong; Seok Yeon Kim; Jae-Joong Kim
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 8.  Controlled-release carvedilol in the management of systemic hypertension and myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  William H Frishman; Linda S Henderson; Mary Ann Lukas
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.