PURPOSE: In vivo detection of apoptosis is a diagnostic tool with potential clinical applications in cardiology and oncology. Radiolabeled annexin-V (anxV) is an ideal probe for in vivo apoptosis detection owing to its strong affinity for phosphatidylserine (PS), the molecular flag on the surface of apoptotic cells. Most clinical studies performed to visualize apoptosis have used (99m)Tc-anxV; however, its poor distribution profile often compromises image quality. In this study, tumor apoptosis after therapy was visualized by positron emission tomography (PET) using (64)Cu-labeled streptavidin (SAv), following pre-targeting of apoptotic cells with biotinylated anxV. METHODS: Apoptosis was induced in tumor-bearing mice by photodynamic therapy (PDT) using phthalocyanine dyes as photosensitizers, and red light. After PDT, mice were injected i.v. with biotinylated anxV, followed 2 h later by an avidin chase, and after another 2 h with (64)Cu-DOTA-biotin-SAv. PET images were subsequently recorded up to 13 h after PDT. RESULTS: PET images delineated apoptosis in treated tumors as early as 30 min after (64)Cu-DOTA-biotin-SAv administration, with tumor-to-background ratios reaching a maximum at 3 h post-injection, i.e., 7 h post-PDT. Omitting the administration of biotinylated anxV or the avidin chase failed to provide a clear PET image, confirming that all three steps are essential for adequate visualization of apoptosis. Furthermore, differences in action mechanisms between photosensitizers that target tumor cells directly or via initial vascular stasis were clearly recognized through differences in tracer uptake patterns detecting early or delayed apoptosis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the efficacy of a three-step (64)Cu pretargeting procedure for PET imaging of apoptosis. Our data also confirm the usefulness of small animal PET to evaluate cancer treatment protocols.
PURPOSE: In vivo detection of apoptosis is a diagnostic tool with potential clinical applications in cardiology and oncology. Radiolabeled annexin-V (anxV) is an ideal probe for in vivo apoptosis detection owing to its strong affinity for phosphatidylserine (PS), the molecular flag on the surface of apoptotic cells. Most clinical studies performed to visualize apoptosis have used (99m)Tc-anxV; however, its poor distribution profile often compromises image quality. In this study, tumor apoptosis after therapy was visualized by positron emission tomography (PET) using (64)Cu-labeled streptavidin (SAv), following pre-targeting of apoptotic cells with biotinylated anxV. METHODS: Apoptosis was induced in tumor-bearing mice by photodynamic therapy (PDT) using phthalocyanine dyes as photosensitizers, and red light. After PDT, mice were injected i.v. with biotinylated anxV, followed 2 h later by an avidin chase, and after another 2 h with (64)Cu-DOTA-biotin-SAv. PET images were subsequently recorded up to 13 h after PDT. RESULTS: PET images delineated apoptosis in treated tumors as early as 30 min after (64)Cu-DOTA-biotin-SAv administration, with tumor-to-background ratios reaching a maximum at 3 h post-injection, i.e., 7 h post-PDT. Omitting the administration of biotinylated anxV or the avidin chase failed to provide a clear PET image, confirming that all three steps are essential for adequate visualization of apoptosis. Furthermore, differences in action mechanisms between photosensitizers that target tumor cells directly or via initial vascular stasis were clearly recognized through differences in tracer uptake patterns detecting early or delayed apoptosis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the efficacy of a three-step (64)Cu pretargeting procedure for PET imaging of apoptosis. Our data also confirm the usefulness of small animal PET to evaluate cancer treatment protocols.
Authors: D B Axworthy; J M Reno; M D Hylarides; R W Mallett; L J Theodore; L M Gustavson; F Su; L J Hobson; P L Beaumier; A R Fritzberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H H Boersma; I H Liem; G J Kemerink; P W L Thimister; L Hofstra; L M L Stolk; W L van Heerde; M-T W Pakbiers; D Janssen; A J Beysens; C P M Reutelingsperger; G A K Heidendal Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Gerrit J Kemerink; Xuan Liu; Davy Kieffer; Sarah Ceyssens; Luc Mortelmans; Alfons M Verbruggen; Neil D Steinmetz; Jean-Luc Vanderheyden; Allan M Green; Kristin Verbeke Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Y Waerzeggers; P Monfared; T Viel; A Faust; K Kopka; M Schäfers; B Tavitian; A Winkeler; A Jacobs Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Lisette Ungethüm; Heidi Kenis; Gerry A Nicolaes; Ludovic Autin; Svetla Stoilova-McPhie; Chris P M Reutelingsperger Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jian Gong; Richard Archer; Michael Brown; Seth Fisher; Connie Chang; Matthew Peacock; Christopher Hughes; Bruce Freimark Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Brian M Zeglis; Christian Brand; Dalya Abdel-Atti; Kathryn E Carnazza; Brendon E Cook; Sean Carlin; Thomas Reiner; Jason S Lewis Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 4.939