E Isakov1. 1. Kinesiology Laboratory, Orthopedic Rehabilitation Department, Loewenstein Hospital, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ra'anana, Israel. elii@clalit.org.il
Abstract
AIM: Gait rehabilitation programs often require either partial weight-bearing (PWB) or encourage full weight-bearing (FWB) on the affected limb. Until recently, there was no objective and practical way to measure correct weight-bearing during ambulation. The present study evaluates a new in-shoe device (SmartStep, Andante Medical Devices Ltd.) for measuring the amount of weight on the affected limb and for biofeedback gait training. METHODS: The first part of the study aimed to establish the validity of the SmartStep by comparing the results obtained from this device with the results obtained from a force plate. The second part aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the SmartStep as a biofeedback method in patients who have been referred for FWB gait rehabilitation. Analysis was based on independent samples t-test and chi squared test for evaluating statistically significant differences between the 2 gait rehabilitation modes. RESULTS: The SmartStep could repeat the same results with 0.53 kg error of mean. Statistically significant correlation was found between results obtained from the SmartStep and from the force plate (R2=0.9067 and P=0.004). The use of the SmartStep auditory biofeedback, significantly (P=0.00031) improved patients' weight-bearing over the affected limb in the experimental group (7.9 kg +/-5.28) as compared to the control group (0.7+/-2.41 kg). CONCLUSIONS: The SmartStep proved to be very reliable since it generated significant repeatable results which correlated significantly with those obtained from a force plate. Patients recommended for FWB gait can significantly improve body weight loading over the affected limb by the use of the SmartStep auditory biofeedback.
RCT Entities:
AIM: Gait rehabilitation programs often require either partial weight-bearing (PWB) or encourage full weight-bearing (FWB) on the affected limb. Until recently, there was no objective and practical way to measure correct weight-bearing during ambulation. The present study evaluates a new in-shoe device (SmartStep, Andante Medical Devices Ltd.) for measuring the amount of weight on the affected limb and for biofeedback gait training. METHODS: The first part of the study aimed to establish the validity of the SmartStep by comparing the results obtained from this device with the results obtained from a force plate. The second part aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the SmartStep as a biofeedback method in patients who have been referred for FWB gait rehabilitation. Analysis was based on independent samples t-test and chi squared test for evaluating statistically significant differences between the 2 gait rehabilitation modes. RESULTS: The SmartStep could repeat the same results with 0.53 kg error of mean. Statistically significant correlation was found between results obtained from the SmartStep and from the force plate (R2=0.9067 and P=0.004). The use of the SmartStep auditory biofeedback, significantly (P=0.00031) improved patients' weight-bearing over the affected limb in the experimental group (7.9 kg +/-5.28) as compared to the control group (0.7+/-2.41 kg). CONCLUSIONS: The SmartStep proved to be very reliable since it generated significant repeatable results which correlated significantly with those obtained from a force plate. Patients recommended for FWB gait can significantly improve body weight loading over the affected limb by the use of the SmartStep auditory biofeedback.
Authors: M Jason Highsmith; Casey R Andrews; Claire Millman; Ashley Fuller; Jason T Kahle; Tyler D Klenow; Katherine L Lewis; Rachel C Bradley; John J Orriola Journal: Technol Innov Date: 2016-09-01
Authors: Benedikt J Braun; Nils T Veith; Mika Rollmann; Marcel Orth; Tobias Fritz; Steven C Herath; Jörg H Holstein; Tim Pohlemann Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Cory L Christiansen; Michael J Bade; Roger J Paxton; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Cory L Christiansen; Michael J Bade; Bradley S Davidson; Michael R Dayton; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Cory L Christiansen; Michael J Bade; David A Weitzenkamp; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 2.840