| Literature DB >> 17020674 |
Ignacio Alberca, Ma Soledad Asuero, José L Bóveda, Nelly Carpio, Enric Contreras, Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar, Alejandro Forteza, José A García-Erce, Abelardo García de Lorenzo, Carmen Gomar, Aurelio Gómez, Juan V Llau, María F López-Fernández, Victoria Moral, Manuel Muñoz, José A Páramo, Pablo Torrabadella, Manuel Quintana, Calixto Sánchez.
Abstract
The Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion (AABT) has been drawn up by a panel of experts from 5 scientific societies. The Spanish Societies of Anesthesiology (SEDAR), Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), Hematology and Hemotherapy (AEHH), Blood Transfusion (SETS) and Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) have sponsored and participated in this Consensus Document. Alternatives to blood transfusion have been divided into pharmacological and non-pharmacological, with 4 modules and 12 topics. The main objective variable was the reduction of allogenic blood transfusions and/or the number of transfused patients. The extent to which this objective was achieved by each AABT was evaluated using the Delphi method, which classifies the grade of recommendation from A (supported by controlled studies) to E (non-controlled studies and expert opinion). The experts concluded that most of the indications for AABT were based on middle or low grades of recommendation, "C", "D", or "E", thus indicating the need for further controlled studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17020674 DOI: 10.1157/13093075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Clin (Barc) ISSN: 0025-7753 Impact factor: 1.725