Literature DB >> 17020559

Effect of postconditioning on coronary blood flow velocity and endothelial function and LV recovery after myocardial infarction.

Xiaojing Ma1, Xinghua Zhang, Chunmei Li, Man Luo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Postconditioning is a novel approach to myocardial protection during ischemia reperfusion. Our study observed the effect of postconditioning on coronary blood flow velocity and endothelial function in patients who underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: Ninety-four patients with their first acute myocardial infarction who underwent revascularization within 12 hours of onset by primary PCI were recruited in the study. All the patients were randomized to two groups, IR group (PCI without postconditioning) and Postcond group (PCI with postconditioning). Corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) was used to evaluate velocity of coronary blood after PCI. Creatine phosphokinase (CK), CK-MB, and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured before and after PCI. Arterial endothelial function was studied noninvasively by examination of brachial artery responses to endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent stimuli by echo Doppler technique. Wall motion score index (WMSI) was assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography before and 8 weeks after angioplasty.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, presence of angiographically visible collaterals, and elapsed time from the onset of symptoms until perfusion. Patients with postconditioning had much faster CTFC than patients without postconditioning (25.38 +/- 5.35 vs 29.23 +/- 5.54). After 8 weeks, the WMSI improved significantly in both groups, but the DeltaWMSI in Postcond group was significantly larger than that of IR group (1.20 +/- 0.30 vs 1.04 +/- 0.36, P < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between DeltaWMSI and CTFC in IR group and Postcond group (r = -0.9032, P < 0.01; r = -0.7884, P < 0.01). The peaks of CK and CK-MB of Postcond group were much lower than that of IR group (1236.57 +/- 813.21 U/L vs 1697.36 +/- 965.74 U/L; 116.92 +/- 75.83 U/L vs 172.41 +/- 92.64 U/L), and MDA-reactive products were significantly lower than that in the IR group at any same time after PCI. All patients with acute myocardial infarction had a depressed endothelium-dependent vasodilation function, while the endothelium-dependent vasodilation function was improved in Postcond group.
CONCLUSION: Postconditioning is a simple, operative procedure for salvaging the coronary endothelial function and cardiomyocyte. It could be used widely in clinic and to better the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17020559     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00191.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  28 in total

1.  Endogenous cardioprotection by ischaemic postconditioning and remote conditioning.

Authors:  Weiwei Shi; Jakob Vinten-Johansen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Postconditioning against ischaemia-reperfusion injury: ready for wide application in patients?

Authors:  T Yetgin; O C Manintveld; D J Duncker; W J van der Giessen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  The evolving story of "conditioning" to protect against acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Clinical effect of postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xian-qing Hu; Jian Cheng; Biao Tang; Zhong-heng Zhang; Ke Huang; Yi-ping Yang; Yan-yan Mao; Ming Zhong; Shen-wen Fu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Protection of the ischemic myocardium during the reperfusion: between hope and reality.

Authors:  Jean Chrisostome Bopassa
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-07-25

6.  New horizons in cardioprotection: recommendations from the 2010 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop.

Authors:  Lisa Schwartz Longacre; Robert A Kloner; Andrew E Arai; Christopher P Baines; Roberto Bolli; Eugene Braunwald; James Downey; Raymond J Gibbons; Roberta A Gottlieb; Gerd Heusch; Robert B Jennings; David J Lefer; Robert M Mentzer; Elizabeth Murphy; Michel Ovize; Peipei Ping; Karin Przyklenk; Michael N Sack; Richard S Vander Heide; Jakob Vinten-Johansen; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The therapeutic potential of ischemic conditioning: an update.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Ischemic postconditioning does not provide cardioprotection from long-term ischemic injury in isolated male or female rat hearts.

Authors:  Daniel S Lee; Gregory E Steinbaugh; Ricardo Quarrie; Fuchun Yang; M A Hassan Talukder; Jay L Zweier; Juan A Crestanello
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Conditioning the heart to prevent myocardial reperfusion injury during PPCI.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2012-04

10.  Responses of Endothelial Cells Towards Ischemic Conditioning Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Sauri Hernández-Reséndiz; Mónica Muñoz-Vega; Whendy E Contreras; Gustavo E Crespo-Avilan; Julian Rodriguez-Montesinos; Oscar Arias-Carrión; Oscar Pérez-Méndez; William A Boisvert; Klaus T Preissner; Hector A Cabrera-Fuentes
Journal:  Cond Med       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.