Literature DB >> 17020397

Drug costs associated with non-adherence to cholesterol management guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in an elderly population: the Rotterdam study.

Pearl D Gumbs1, W M Monique Verschuren, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Ardine G de Wit, Albert Hofman, Paul H Trienekens, Bruno H Ch Stricker, Antonius de Boer, Olaf H Klungel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands, costs of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) use have recently increased sharply compared with costs of other drugs. However, several studies have established both undertreatment and non-guidelines-indicated treatment with statins, suggesting a suboptimal use of resources.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the drug costs associated with non-guidelines-indicated treatment and undertreatment with statins in an elderly population. PATIENTS AND
SETTING: Data were obtained from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based prospective cohort study which began in 1990 with 7983 participants aged > or =55 years. Subjects with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were excluded. Pharmacy records were used to assess patterns of medication use in daily medical practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Non-guidelines-indicated treatment and undertreatment with statins were established in relation to Dutch cholesterol management guidelines for all participants. We calculated the costs of statin therapy associated with non-guidelines-indicated treatment, and the costs of statins if all those undertreated were to receive statins. The results were projected on to the Dutch population to determine the economic implications of non-adherence to cholesterol management guidelines in the elderly.
RESULTS: Of the participants who started treatment with statins for the primary prevention of CVD during follow-up, 69% received non-guidelines-indicated treatment. More men (7.5%) were undertreated than women (1.6%) and more women (6.2%) received non-guidelines-indicated treatment than men (1.5%). Among the participants without CVD who were still alive at 1 January 2002, 14% were eligible for statin therapy but were untreated. After projection of the prevalence of non-guidelines-indicated treatment and undertreatment to the Dutch population, the absolute costs for non-guidelines-indicated treatment with statins in 2005 were estimated to be approximately 23 million euro(uncertainty limits [UL]: 19-28 million euro), while the cost to eliminate undertreatment was also 23 million euro (UL: 19-28 million euro).
CONCLUSION: Reallocation of resources used for statin therapy from those receiving non-guidelines-indicated treatment to those being undertreated could lead to a more efficient use of resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17020397     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200623090-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  18 in total

1.  Sex differences in health problems, diagnostic testing, and referral in primary care.

Authors:  M J Stoverinck; A L Lagro-Janssen; C V Weel
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Clinical outcomes in statin treatment trials: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S D Ross; I E Allen; J E Connelly; B M Korenblat; M E Smith; D Bishop; D Luo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999 Aug 9-23

3.  Use and monitoring of "statin" lipid-lowering drugs compared with guidelines.

Authors:  S A Abookire; A S Karson; J Fiskio; D W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-01-08

4.  Treatment and prevention of coronary heart disease by lowering serum cholesterol levels; from the pioneer work of C.D. de Langen to the third "Dutch Consensus on Cholesterol".

Authors:  J W Jukema; M L Simoons
Journal:  Acta Cardiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Cost-effectiveness of populationwide educational approaches to reduce serum cholesterol levels.

Authors:  A N Tosteson; M C Weinstein; M G Hunink; M A Mittleman; L W Williams; P A Goldman; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-01-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in people at different levels of vascular disease risk: economic analysis of a randomised trial in 20,536 individuals.

Authors:  Borislava Mihaylova; Andrew Briggs; Jane Armitage; Sarah Parish; Alastair Gray; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Medical nutrition therapy lowers serum cholesterol and saves medication costs in men with hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  G Sikand; M L Kashyap; I Yang
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1998-08

8.  Repeated nitrate prescriptions as a potential marker for angina pectoris. A comparison with medical information from the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Anke Hilse Maitland-van der Zee; Olaf H Klungel; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Deirdre A M van der Kuip; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Albert Hofman; Hubertus G M Leufkens; Anthonius de Boer
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2003-04

9.  By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; S G Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-05

10.  Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study.

Authors:  A Hofman; D E Grobbee; P T de Jong; F A van den Ouweland
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.082

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patient factors influencing the prescribing of lipid lowering drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in UK general practice: a national retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Shihua Zhu; Guiqing Lily Yao; Mohammed A Mohammed; Tom Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.