INTRODUCTION: Some patients with ICDs experience the sensation of a shock in the absence of true therapy (phantom shock). We hypothesize that phantom shocks may be a manifestation of anxiety, depression or PTSD. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients over 18 years old with an ICD were eligible to enroll in the study. The first 75 subjects who agreed to participate were enrolled and divided into three groups: ICD patients with phantom shocks (n = 19); ICD patients who had actual shocks (n = 28) and ICD patients who had no shocks (n = 28). During a clinic visit a demographic questionnaire and three psychological rating scales were administered: the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Posttraumatic Stress Checklist (PCL-C). No significant differences between groups were found in gender, race, age, history of MI or cardiac surgery status. Data analysis of the psychological indices using one-way ANOVA showed that the group with phantom shocks had more depression (CES-D p = 0.011) and more anxiety (STAI p = 0.010) than the other groups. Multiple comparisons of group means showed a greater percentage of clinically depressed patients in the phantom shock group than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with phantom shocks are more likely to be clinically depressed and have higher levels of anxiety than other ICD patients, regardless of history of actual shocks.
INTRODUCTION: Some patients with ICDs experience the sensation of a shock in the absence of true therapy (phantom shock). We hypothesize that phantom shocks may be a manifestation of anxiety, depression or PTSD. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients over 18 years old with an ICD were eligible to enroll in the study. The first 75 subjects who agreed to participate were enrolled and divided into three groups: ICDpatients with phantom shocks (n = 19); ICDpatients who had actual shocks (n = 28) and ICDpatients who had no shocks (n = 28). During a clinic visit a demographic questionnaire and three psychological rating scales were administered: the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Posttraumatic Stress Checklist (PCL-C). No significant differences between groups were found in gender, race, age, history of MI or cardiac surgery status. Data analysis of the psychological indices using one-way ANOVA showed that the group with phantom shocks had more depression (CES-D p = 0.011) and more anxiety (STAI p = 0.010) than the other groups. Multiple comparisons of group means showed a greater percentage of clinically depressedpatients in the phantom shock group than in the other groups. CONCLUSION:Patients with phantom shocks are more likely to be clinically depressed and have higher levels of anxiety than other ICDpatients, regardless of history of actual shocks.
Authors: Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S J Connolly; M Gent; R S Roberts; P Dorian; D Roy; R S Sheldon; L B Mitchell; M S Green; G J Klein; B O'Brien Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-03-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John Hsu; Connie Uratsu; Alison Truman; Charles Quesenberry; Kathryn M McDonald; Mark A Hlatky; Joe Selby Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Sony Jacob; Sidakpal S Panaich; Sandip K Zalawadiya; George McKelvey; George Abraham; Rajeev Aravindhakshan; Samuel F Sears; Jamie B Conti; H Michael Marsh Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Garrick C Stewart; Joanne R Weintraub; Parakash P Pratibhu; Marc J Semigran; Janice M Camuso; Kimberly Brooks; Sui W Tsang; Mary Susan Anello; Viviane T Nguyen; Eldrin F Lewis; Anju Nohria; Akshay S Desai; Michael M Givertz; Lynne W Stevenson Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Chaya G Bhuvaneswar; Jeremy N Ruskin; Anna Roglieri Katzman; Nellie Wood; Roger K Pitman Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Peter Ofman; Peter Hoffmeister; Danny G Kaloupek; David R Gagnon; Adelqui Peralta; Luc Djousse; J Michael Gaziano; Catherine R Rahilly-Tierney Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 2.882