Literature DB >> 17019162

Multiple choice questions: their value as an assessment tool.

E Moss1.   

Abstract

Multiple choice questions are a well-established, reliable method of assessing knowledge and are used widely in postgraduate examinations in anaesthesiology. Like other methods of assessment they have their strengths and weaknesses. With the drive for revalidation and changes in undergraduate medical education much work has been done on devising valid, reliable and feasible methods of assessment of clinical practice including the need for the use of several different methods. Different multiple choice question formats have been devised and the importance of well-written multiple choice questions with clear assessment objectives recognized. There is controversy about the use of number-right as opposed to negative marking but, provided that the candidates know which marking system is being used, either method is satisfactory. The pass standard should be determined using criterion-based rather than norm-based referencing. Multiple choice questions could be used to validate continuing education and professional development from reading, possibly using web-based technology. For as long as there is a need to test knowledge in the assessment of doctors and medical undergraduates multiple choice questions will have a part to play, but only as one component of the assessment of clinical competence.

Year:  2001        PMID: 17019162     DOI: 10.1097/00001503-200112000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  6 in total

1.  Guidelines for the construction of multiple choice questions tests.

Authors:  Mohammed O Al-Rukban
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2006-09

2.  Effect of blueprinting methods on test difficulty, discrimination, and reliability indices: cross-sectional study in an integrated learning program.

Authors:  Hussein Abdellatif; Abdullah M Al-Shahrani
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-01-22

3.  Relationship between web-based illness scripts and the performance of medical students in orthopedic surgery placements.

Authors:  Chirathit Anusitviwat; Theerawit Hongnaparak; Varah Yuenyongviwat; Khanin Iamthanaporn; Pakjai Tuntarattanapong; Jongdee Bvonpanttarananon; Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-30

4.  Understanding the limits of parametrial resection in radical hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fortunato Genovese; Stefano Siringo; Attilio Tuscano; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Francesco Cannone; Vito Leanza; Francesco Cosentino; Stefano Palomba; Marco Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2021-11-03

5.  Contemplation on marking scheme for Type X multiple choice questions, and an illustration of a practically applicable scheme.

Authors:  Nazeem Ishrat Siddiqui; Vinayak H Bhavsar; Arnav V Bhavsar; Sukhwant Bose
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.200

6.  Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Mohammad Irshad; Shafiul Haque; Tauseef Ahmad; Kamran Sattar; Mahmoud Salah Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.