Literature DB >> 17019024

Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion.

Guowei Zhang1, Ziping Jiang, David Shepard, Bin Zhang, Cedric Yu.   

Abstract

We have studied the application of direct aperture optimization (DAO) as an inverse planning tool for breast IMRT. Additionally, we have analysed the impact of respiratory motion on the quality of the delivered dose distribution. From this analysis, we have developed guidelines for balancing the desire for a high-quality optimized plan with the need to create a plan that will not degrade significantly in the presence of respiratory motion. For a DAO optimized breast IMRT plan, the tangential fields incorporate a flash field to cover the range of respiratory motion. The inverse planning algorithm then optimizes the shapes and weights of additional segments that are delivered in combination with the open fields. IMRT plans were generated using DAO with the relative weights of the open segments varied from 0% to 95%. To assess the impact of breathing motion, the dose distribution for the optimized IMRT plan was recalculated with the isocentre sampled from a predefined distribution in a Monte Carlo convolution/superposition dose engine with the breast simulated as a rigid object. The motion amplitudes applied in this study ranged from 0.5 to 2.0 cm. For a range of weighting levels assigned to the open field, comparisons were made between the static plans and the plans recalculated with motion. For the static plans, we found that uniform dose distributions could be generated with relative weights for the open segments equal to and below 80% and unacceptable levels of underdosage were observed with the weights larger than 80%. When simulated breathing motion was incorporated into the dose calculation, we observed a loss in dose uniformity as the weight of the open field was decreased to below 65%. More quantitatively, for each 1% decrease in the weight, the per cent volume of the target covered by at least 95% of the prescribed dose decreased by approximately 0.10% and 0.16% for motion amplitudes equal to 1.5 cm and 2.0 cm, respectively. When taking into account the motion effects, the most uniform and conformal dose distributions were achieved when the open segment weights were in the range of 65-80%. Within this range, high-quality IMRT plans were produced for each case. The study demonstrates that DAO with tangential fields provides a robust and efficient technique for breast IMRT planning and delivery when the open segment weight is selected between 65% and 80%.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17019024     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/20/N01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Deterministic direct aperture optimization using multiphase piecewise constant segmentation.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Daniel O'Connor; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effect of breathing motion in radiotherapy of breast cancer: 4D dose calculation and motion tracking via EPID.

Authors:  Anne Richter; Reinhard Sweeney; Kurt Baier; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  A hybrid algorithm for instant optimization of beam weights in anatomy-based intensity modulated radiotherapy: A performance evaluation study.

Authors:  Ranganathan Vaitheeswaran; Narayanan V K Sathiya; Janhavi R Bhangle; Amit Nirhali; Namita Kumar; Sumit Basu; Vikram Maiya
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-04

4.  Automated planning of whole breast irradiation using hybrid IMRT improves efficiency and quality.

Authors:  Bingqi Guo; Chirag Shah; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Barbara Dobler; Fabian Pohl; Ludwig Bogner; Oliver Koelbl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.