INTRODUCTION: Little has been published regarding clinical predictors of severe toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with combination chemotherapy (CT) with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 142 patients treated between 1996 and 2004 in our center with these regimes with regards to grade 3-4 toxicity and overall survival (OS) rates. Köhne's prognostic classification could be applied in all patients. RESULTS: Köhne classification: good (54.2%), intermediate (26.8%), and poor prognosis (19%). 50.4% received irinotecan-based CT. Median number of cycles 6 with a total response rate of 38.9%. 23.2% stopped first-line CT due to toxicity. 50.7% suffered grade 3-4 toxicity: digestive (28.2%), hematologic (19.7%), and fatigue (25.4%). 7.7% episodes of neutropenic fever with 4.9% toxic deaths. 70.9% of grade 3-4 episodes occurred in the first four cycles. Median follow-up of 33.9 mo; median OS of 15.9 mo. For Köhne classification: good (20 mo), intermediate (15.8 mo), and poor (6.8 mo). Toxicity analysis: female sex and age > 70 yr predicted higher overall grade 3-4 toxicity, with no differences in CT efficacy; age > 70 yr and PS > 1 predicted higher grade 3-4 fatigue. No relationship could be found between baseline laboratory characteristics and higher toxicity, except baseline hemoglobin and grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Female and elderly patients have a higher grade 3-4 toxicity rate when treated with combination CT with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Prognostic classifications such as Köhne's can help differentiate subgroups of patients who benefit little with the use of combination CT.
INTRODUCTION: Little has been published regarding clinical predictors of severe toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with combination chemotherapy (CT) with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 142 patients treated between 1996 and 2004 in our center with these regimes with regards to grade 3-4 toxicity and overall survival (OS) rates. Köhne's prognostic classification could be applied in all patients. RESULTS: Köhne classification: good (54.2%), intermediate (26.8%), and poor prognosis (19%). 50.4% received irinotecan-based CT. Median number of cycles 6 with a total response rate of 38.9%. 23.2% stopped first-line CT due to toxicity. 50.7% suffered grade 3-4 toxicity: digestive (28.2%), hematologic (19.7%), and fatigue (25.4%). 7.7% episodes of neutropenic fever with 4.9% toxic deaths. 70.9% of grade 3-4 episodes occurred in the first four cycles. Median follow-up of 33.9 mo; median OS of 15.9 mo. For Köhne classification: good (20 mo), intermediate (15.8 mo), and poor (6.8 mo). Toxicity analysis: female sex and age > 70 yr predicted higher overall grade 3-4 toxicity, with no differences in CT efficacy; age > 70 yr and PS > 1 predicted higher grade 3-4 fatigue. No relationship could be found between baseline laboratory characteristics and higher toxicity, except baseline hemoglobin and grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Female and elderly patients have a higher grade 3-4 toxicity rate when treated with combination CT with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Prognostic classifications such as Köhne's can help differentiate subgroups of patients who benefit little with the use of combination CT.
Authors: S Giacchetti; B Perpoint; R Zidani; N Le Bail; R Faggiuolo; C Focan; P Chollet; J F Llory; Y Letourneau; B Coudert; F Bertheaut-Cvitkovic; D Larregain-Fournier; A Le Rol; S Walter; R Adam; J L Misset; F Lévi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C H Köhne; D Cunningham; F Di Costanzo; B Glimelius; G Blijham; E Aranda; W Scheithauer; P Rougier; M Palmer; J Wils; B Baron; F Pignatti; P Schöffski; S Micheel; H Hecker Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: L B Saltz; J V Cox; C Blanke; L S Rosen; L Fehrenbacher; M J Moore; J A Maroun; S P Ackland; P K Locker; N Pirotta; G L Elfring; L L Miller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Piedbois; P Rougier; M Buyse; J Pignon; L Ryan; R Hansen; B Zee; B Weinerman; J Pater; C Leichman; J Macdonald; J Benedetti; J Lokich; J Fryer; G Brufman; R Isacson; A Laplanche; E Levy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeff A Sloan; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Delfino Vargas-Chanes; Suresh Nair; Steven S Cha; Paul J Novotny; Michael A Poon; Michael J O'Connell; Charles L Loprinzi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Milano; M C Etienne; E Cassuto-Viguier; A Thyss; J Santini; M Frenay; N Renee; M Schneider; F Demard Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M C Etienne; J L Lagrange; O Dassonville; R Fleming; A Thyss; N Renée; M Schneider; F Demard; G Milano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan Olof G Karlsson; Karin Adolfsson; Bo Thelin; Per Jynge; Rolf Gg Andersson; Ursula G Falkmer Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Pasquale F Innominato; Annabelle Ballesta; Qi Huang; Christian Focan; Philippe Chollet; Abdoulaye Karaboué; Sylvie Giacchetti; Mohamed Bouchahda; René Adam; Carlo Garufi; Francis A Lévi Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 4.452