Literature DB >> 17018518

Regions of high differentiation--worth a check.

Bettina Harr1.   

Abstract

B. Boursot and K. Belkhir in this issue of Genome Research point to an ascertainment bias in my use of SNPs to identify regions of high differentiation between a pair of house mouse subspecies. Here, I discuss additional points to consider and argue that the ultimate test for such regions should be an independent confirmation using unrelated samples. I provide evidence that regions of high differentiation as identified from laboratory strains and potentially biased SNP markers can be confirmed and therefore are worth a deeper investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17018518     DOI: 10.1101/gr.5787706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  4 in total

Review 1.  Population genomics and speciation.

Authors:  Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Disruption of genetic interaction between two autosomal regions and the X chromosome causes reproductive isolation between mouse strains derived from different subspecies.

Authors:  Ayako Oka; Toshihiro Aoto; Yoshikazu Totsuka; Riichi Takahashi; Masatsugu Ueda; Akihiko Mita; Noriko Sakurai-Yamatani; Hiromi Yamamoto; Satoshi Kuriki; Nobuo Takagi; Kazuo Moriwaki; Toshihiko Shiroishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The uncharacterized gene 1700093K21Rik and flanking regions are correlated with reproductive isolation in the house mouse, Mus musculus.

Authors:  David H Kass; Václav Janoušek; Liuyang Wang; Priscilla K Tucker
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Nucleotide variation in wild and inbred mice.

Authors:  Tovah Salcedo; Armando Geraldes; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.