Literature DB >> 17018081

Optimization of DNA extraction from low-yield and degraded samples using the BioRobot EZ1 and BioRobot M48.

Ram Kishore1, W Reef Hardy, Vince J Anderson, Nick A Sanchez, Martin R Buoncristiani.   

Abstract

Robotic extraction of DNA from dilutions of blood and semen using either the BioRobots EZ1 or BioRobots M48 consistently produced lower recoveries than standard organic extractions of the same samples. In an effort to increase the efficiency of robotically extracted DNA, glycogen and carrier RNA were added following cell lysis. The addition of glycogen, postlysis, resulted in no improvement in DNA recovery with the BioRobot EZ1. However, when carrier RNA was added to the cell lysate of limited and degraded samples extracted on the EZ1 or the M48, DNA recoveries dramatically increased four- to 20-fold. DNA yields obtained by robotic extraction in the presence of carrier RNA were as high, or higher, as those obtained by organic extraction lacking carrier RNA, while experiments that utilized carrier RNA in both types of extractions showed increased sensitivity for both methods. Furthermore, carrier RNA substantially increased the recovery of fragmented DNA with the EZ1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17018081     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00204.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of carrier RNA and low volume demineralization for recovery of nuclear DNA from human teeth.

Authors:  Denice Higgins; John Kaidonis; Grant Townsend; Jeremy J Austin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Comparison of an automated nucleic acid extraction system with the column-based procedure.

Authors:  Hagen Frickmann; Rebecca Hinz; Ralf Matthias Hagen
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2015-03-26

3.  Biases during DNA extraction affect bacterial and archaeal community profile of anaerobic digestion samples.

Authors:  Ashira Roopnarain; Mashudu Mukhuba; Rasheed Adeleke; Mokhele Moeletsi
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Nails as a primary sample type for molecular genetic identification of highly decomposed human remains.

Authors:  Jezerka Inkret; Eva Podovšovnik; Tomaž Zupanc; Irena Zupanič Pajnič
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Molecular genetic identification of skeletal remains from the Second World War Konfin I mass grave in Slovenia.

Authors:  Irena Zupanic Pajnic; Barbara Gornjak Pogorelc; Joze Balazic
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Highly efficient and automated extraction of DNA from human remains using a modified EZ1 protocol.

Authors:  Anna Barbaro; Sasha Samar; Giacomo Falcone; Angelo La Marca
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2021-01-18

Review 7.  Current genetic methodologies in the identification of disaster victims and in forensic analysis.

Authors:  Ewa Ziętkiewicz; Magdalena Witt; Patrycja Daca; Jadwiga Zebracka-Gala; Mariusz Goniewicz; Barbara Jarząb; Michał Witt
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Improved methods of carnivore faecal sample preservation, DNA extraction and quantification for accurate genotyping of wild tigers.

Authors:  Patlolla Anuradha Reddy; Maradani Bhavanishankar; Jyotsna Bhagavatula; Katakam Harika; Ranjeet Singh Mahla; Sisinthy Shivaji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sequencing platform and library preparation choices impact viral metagenomes.

Authors:  Sergei A Solonenko; J César Ignacio-Espinoza; Adriana Alberti; Corinne Cruaud; Steven Hallam; Kostas Konstantinidis; Gene Tyson; Patrick Wincker; Matthew B Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Technical Brief: a novel strategy for enrichment of trabecular meshwork protease proteome.

Authors:  Renata Picciani; Anna K Junk; Sanjoy K Bhattacharya
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.