Robert T Pu1, Lauren E Laitala, Douglas P Clark. 1. Department of Pathology, Division of Cytopathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. robertpu@umich.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test DNA methylation profiling in detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three bladder specimens were analyzed for the DNA p16INK4a, RASSF1, APC, GSTP, E-Cad and CyclinD2 genes to determine if there is a difference in gene methylation between benign and malignant cases. Urine samples were analyzed in a feasibility study. Finally, methylation profiles of urine samples were obtained and compared with follow-up biopsy diagnoses. RESULTS: We found methylated genes in 18% benign, 37% urothelial carcinoma in situ and 93% infiltrating urothelial carcinoma cases (p = 0.001). Methylation profiles from the 18 urine samples revealed a significantly higher prevalence of methylated genes in carcinoma cases than benign cases (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). We analyzed methylation profiles in 37 cytologically atypical urine samples with malignant or benign diagnosis on surgical follow-up andfound that only APC (55% in malignant vs. 0% in benign, p=0.025) and CyclinD2 were differentially methylated (35% in malignant vs. 0% in benign, p=0.2) while p14ARF, p16INK4a, RASSF1, GSTP and E-Cad had similar methylation profiles. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that methylation of p14ARF, p16INK4a, RASSF1, GSTP and E-Cad genes may not accurately identify carcinoma, but methylated APC and CyclinD2 might be useful biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma in urine.
OBJECTIVE: To test DNA methylation profiling in detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three bladder specimens were analyzed for the DNA p16INK4a, RASSF1, APC, GSTP, E-Cad and CyclinD2 genes to determine if there is a difference in gene methylation between benign and malignant cases. Urine samples were analyzed in a feasibility study. Finally, methylation profiles of urine samples were obtained and compared with follow-up biopsy diagnoses. RESULTS: We found methylated genes in 18% benign, 37% urothelial carcinoma in situ and 93% infiltrating urothelial carcinoma cases (p = 0.001). Methylation profiles from the 18 urine samples revealed a significantly higher prevalence of methylated genes in carcinoma cases than benign cases (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). We analyzed methylation profiles in 37 cytologically atypical urine samples with malignant or benign diagnosis on surgical follow-up andfound that only APC (55% in malignant vs. 0% in benign, p=0.025) and CyclinD2 were differentially methylated (35% in malignant vs. 0% in benign, p=0.2) while p14ARF, p16INK4a, RASSF1, GSTP and E-Cad had similar methylation profiles. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that methylation of p14ARF, p16INK4a, RASSF1, GSTP and E-Cad genes may not accurately identify carcinoma, but methylated APC and CyclinD2 might be useful biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma in urine.
Authors: Maria José Cabello; Laura Grau; Noreli Franco; Esteban Orenes; Miguel Alvarez; Ana Blanca; Oscar Heredero; Alberto Palacios; Manuel Urrutia; Jesus María Fernández; Antonio López-Beltrán; Marta Sánchez-Carbayo Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Rodrigo García-Baquero; Patricia Puerta; Manuel Beltran; Miguel Alvarez-Mújica; Jose Luis Alvarez-Ossorio; Marta Sánchez-Carbayo Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2014-02-28
Authors: Mariana Brait; Shahnaz Begum; André L Carvalho; Santanu Dasgupta; André L Vettore; Bogdan Czerniak; Otávia L Caballero; William H Westra; David Sidransky; Mohammad Obaidul Hoque Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.254