Literature DB >> 17017268

Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.

Josh Tome1, Deborah A Nawoczenski, Adolph Flemister, Jeff Houck.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A 2 x 4 mixed-design ANOVA with a fixed factor of group (posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction [PTTD] and asymptomatic controls), and a repeated factor of phase of stance (loading response, midstance, terminal stance, and preswing).
OBJECTIVE: To compare 3-dimensional stance period kinematics (rearfoot eversion/inversion, medial longitudinal arch [MLA] angle, and forefoot abduction) of subjects with stage II PTTD to asymptomatic controls.
BACKGROUND: Abnormal foot postures in subjects with stage II PTTD are clinical indicators of disease progression, yet dynamic investigations of forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot kinematic deviations in this population are lacking.
METHODS: Fourteen subjects with stage II PTTD were compared to 10 control subjects with normal arch index values. Subjects were matched for age, gender, and body mass index. A 5-segment, kinematic model of the leg and foot was tracked using an Optotrak Motion Analysis System. The dependent kinematic variables were rearfoot inversion/eversion, forefoot abduction/adduction, and the MLA angle. An ANOVA model was used to compare kinematic variables between groups across 4 phases of stance.
RESULTS: Subjects with PTTD demonstrated significantly greater rearfoot eversion (P = .042), MLA angle (P = .008) and forefoot abduction angles (P < .005) during specific phases of stance. Subjects with PTTD demonstrated significantly greater rearfoot eversion (P<.004) and MLA angles (P < .009) by 6.2 degrees and 8.0 degrees, respectively, during loading response when compared to controls. During preswing, the subjects with PTTD demonstrated a significantly greater MLA angle (P < .002) and a forefoot abduction angle (P<.001) which exceeded that of the controls by 10.0 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: The abnormal kinematics observed at the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot across all phases of stance implicate a failure of compensatory muscle and secondary ligamentous support to control foot kinematics in subjects with stage II PTTD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17017268     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  32 in total

Review 1.  The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan P L Hall; Christian Barton; Paul Remy Jones; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Choosing among 3 ankle-foot orthoses for a patient with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher G Neville; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Effect of ankle-foot orthotic devices on foot kinematics in Stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Frederick R Lemley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Deep posterior compartment strength and foot kinematics in subjects with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Adolph S Flemister; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and flatfoot: analysis with simulated walking.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Harold B Kitaoka; Tadashi Fujii; Xavier Crevoisier; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  An Ankle-Foot Orthosis With a Lateral Extension Reduces Forefoot Abduction in Subjects With Stage II Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Mary Bucklin; Nathaniel Ordway; Frederick Lemley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  The role of tibialis posterior fatigue on foot kinematics during walking.

Authors:  Michael B Pohl; Melissa Rabbito; Reed Ferber
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Relationships between segmental foot mobility and plantar loading in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Charles L Saltzman; H John Yack
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Kinetics and kinematics after the Bridle procedure for treatment of traumatic foot drop.

Authors:  Mary K Hastings; David R Sinacore; James Woodburn; E Scott Paxton; Sandra E Klein; Jeremy J McCormick; Kathryn L Bohnert; Krista S Beckert; Michelle L Stein; Michael J Strube; Jeffrey E Johnson
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Conservative treatment of a tibialis posterior strain in a novice triathlete: a case report.

Authors:  Scott Howitt; Sarah Jung; Nicole Hammonds
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.