Literature DB >> 17017067

Geographic variation of genetic and behavioral traits in northern and southern tüngara frogs.

Heike Pröhl1, Regina A Koshy, Ulrich Mueller, A Stanley Rand, Michael J Ryan.   

Abstract

We use a combination of microsatellite marker analysis and mate-choice behavior experiments to assess patterns of reproductive isolation of the túngara frog Physalaemus pustulosus along a 550-km transect of 25 populations in Costa Rica and Panama. Earlier studies using allozymes and mitochondrial DNA defined two genetic groups of túngara frogs, one ranging from Mexico to northern Costa Rica (northern group), the second ranging from Panama to northern South America (southern group). Our more fine-scale survey also shows that the northern and southern túngara frogs are genetically different and geographically separated by a gap in the distribution in central Pacific Costa Rica. Genetic differences among populations are highly correlated with geographic distances. Temporal call parameters differed among populations as well as between genetic groups. Differences in calls were explained better by geographic distance than by genetic distance. Phonotaxis experiments showed that females preferred calls of males from their own populations over calls of males from other populations in about two-thirds to three-fourths of the contrasts tested. In mating experiments, females and males from the same group and females from the north with males from the south produced nests and tadpoles. In contrast, females from the south did not produce nests or tadpoles with males from the north. Thus, northern and southern túngara frogs have diverged both genetically and bioacoustically. There is evidence for some prezygotic isolation due to differences in mate recognition and fertilization success, but such isolation is hardly complete. Our results support the general observation that significant differences in sexual signals are often not correlated with strong genetic differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17017067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog.

Authors:  Kathryn E Boul; W Chris Funk; Catherine R Darst; David C Cannatella; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Molecular patterns of differentiation in canyon treefrogs (Hyla arenicolor): evidence for introgressive hybridization with the Arizona treefrog (H. wrightorum) and correlations with advertisement call differences.

Authors:  K E Klymus; S C Humfeld; V T Marshall; D Cannatella; H C Gerhardt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Ecological and genetic divergence between two lineages of middle American túngara frogs Physalaemus (= Engystomops) pustulosus.

Authors:  Heike Pröhl; Santiago R Ron; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Genetic drift does not sufficiently explain patterns of electric signal variation among populations of the mormyrid electric fish Paramormyrops kingsleyae.

Authors:  Sophie Picq; Joshua Sperling; Catherine J Cheng; Bruce A Carlson; Jason R Gallant
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Geographic variation in the acoustic traits of greater horseshoe bats: testing the importance of drift and ecological selection in evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Keping Sun; Li Luo; Rebecca T Kimball; Xuewen Wei; Longru Jin; Tinglei Jiang; Guohong Li; Jiang Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Geographic variation in advertisement calls in a tree frog species: gene flow and selection hypotheses.

Authors:  Yikweon Jang; Eun Hye Hahm; Hyun-Jung Lee; Soyeon Park; Yong-Jin Won; Jae C Choe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Habitat adaptation rather than genetic distance correlates with female preference in fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra).

Authors:  Barbara A Caspers; Claudia Junge; Markus Weitere; Sebastian Steinfartz
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Roaring high and low: composition and possible functions of the Iberian stag's vocal repertoire.

Authors:  Daniela Passilongo; David Reby; Juan Carranza; Marco Apollonio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.).

Authors:  Pia Braune; Sabine Schmidt; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Geographic variation in sexual attraction of Spodoptera frugiperda corn- and rice-strain males to pheromone lures.

Authors:  Melanie Unbehend; Sabine Hänniger; Gissella M Vásquez; María Laura Juárez; Dominic Reisig; Jeremy N McNeil; Robert L Meagher; David A Jenkins; David G Heckel; Astrid T Groot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.