Literature DB >> 17016919

Adsorption of ionisable pesticides in soils.

M Kah1, C D Brown.   

Abstract

Understanding the fate of a pesticide in soil is fundamental to the accurate assessment of its environmental behaviour and vital in ensuring the safe use of new and existing products. Ionisable pesticides comprise a significant proportion of both existing and new active substances registered for use in agriculture worldwide. This group of pesticides includes chemicals that are frequently found in groundwater and surface waters in many different countries. Despite this, approaches to predict the influence of soil properties on the behaviour of ionisable pesticides in soils are poorly developed. Current regulatory assessments frequently default to methods developed for nonionic chemicals, although it is evident that ionisable compounds do not often react like neutral molecules. This review presents the state of knowledge on the adsorption of ionisable pesticides in soils. It first introduces the issues concerning adsorption and the characteristics of this particular kind of chemical. The mechanisms postulated for the adsorption of ionisable pesticides are then described: these are hydrophobic partitioning, ionic exchange, charge transfer, ligand exchange, cation or water bridging, and the formation of bound residues. Relatively little experimental evidence is available, and we are still unable to determine the quantitative contribution of each process in a particular situation. Knowledge is still lacking concerning phenomena occurring at the surfaces of soil particles. Measurements do not allow determination of the operative pH at the surface of soil particles or in microenvironments, and the influence of ionic strength or competition effects is difficult to assess. Subsequently, the review focuses on the influence of soil properties on adsorption and on potential to predict the behaviour of ionisable pesticides in soils. Unlike hydrophobic compounds, adsorption of ionisable pesticides is highly sensitive to variation in pH. This relationship mainly derives from the different proportion of ionic and neutral forms of the pesticide present at each pH level but also from the presence of surfaces with pH-dependent charges in soils. Soil organic matter generally promotes adsorption, although a negative influence has sometimes been reported. Clay and oxides can also play a significant role in some cases. So far, no modelling approach has been applied successfully to a range of ionisable pesticides to predict their adsorption in soils. The standardization of experimental settings and the application of approaches specific to a particular class of pesticide or different type of soil might be necessary to describe the complexity of interactions among ionisable molecules. Degradation of ionisable pesticides is influenced by soil pH in a particular way that relates to changes in sorption, changes in composition and activity of the microbial community, and to shifts in the balance between different degradative mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016919     DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-32964-2_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  13 in total

Review 1.  Biochar efficiency in pesticides sorption as a function of production variables--a review.

Authors:  Saba Yavari; Amirhossein Malakahmad; Nasiman B Sapari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Reduced sulfentrazone phytotoxicity through increased adsorption and anionic species in biochar-amended soils.

Authors:  Kailin Liu; Bingqi Yu; Kun Luo; Xiangying Liu; Lianyang Bai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Analysing the fate of nanopesticides in soil and the applicability of regulatory protocols using a polymer-based nanoformulation of atrazine.

Authors:  Melanie Kah; Patrick Machinski; Petra Koerner; Karen Tiede; Renato Grillo; Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto; Thilo Hofmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  A meta-analysis of pesticide loss in runoff under conventional tillage and no-till management.

Authors:  Daniel Elias; Lixin Wang; Pierre-Andre Jacinthe
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Sorption of sulfisoxazole onto soil--an insight into different influencing factors.

Authors:  Joanna Maszkowska; Anna Białk-Bielińska; Katarzyna Mioduszewska; Marta Wagil; Jolanta Kumirska; Piotr Stepnowski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Persistence, variance and toxic levels of organochlorine pesticides in fluvial sediments and the role of black carbon in their retention.

Authors:  Musarrat Parween; Al Ramanathan; P S Khillare; N J Raju
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Degradation and adsorption of tralkoxydim in Chinese soils and water-sediment environments.

Authors:  Wen Zhu Wu; Zheng Jun Shan; De Yang Kong; Jian He
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Occurrence of 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium (Paraquat) in irrigated soil of the Lake Chad Basin, Niger.

Authors:  Marc Crampon; Yoann Copard; Guillaume Favreau; Julie Raux; Nadine Merlet-Machour; Mathieu Le Coz; Maïmouna Ibrahim; Valérie Peulon-Agasse; Florence Portet-Koltalo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Desorption and mobilization of three strobilurin fungicides in three types of soil.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Wen Zhu Wu; Zhi Hua Han; Hong Yang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Adsorption-desorption and leaching potential of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in acidic Malaysian soil amended with cow dung and rice husk ash.

Authors:  Jamilu Garba; Abd Wahid Samsuri; Radziah Othman; Muhammad Saiful Ahmad Hamdani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.