Literature DB >> 17016736

Phototoxic effects of commercial photographic flash lamp on rat eyes.

Makoto Inoue1, Kei Shinoda, Hisao Ohde, Keiji Tezuka, Tetsuo Hida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine whether exposure of the cornea and retina of rats to flashes from a commercial photographic flash lamp is phototoxic.
METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 10, 100, or 1,000 flashes of the OPTICAM 16M photographic flash lamp (Fujikoeki, Japan) placed 0.1, 1, or 3 m from the eyes. Corneal damage was assessed by a fluorescein staining score, and the retinal damage by eletroretinography (ERG) and histology before and 24 h after exposure.
RESULTS: Exposure of the eyes to 1,000 flashes at 0.1 m increased the fluorescein staining score significantly (P = 0.009, the Mann-Whitney test). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the cornea showed a detachment of the epithelial cells from the surface after this exposure. The amplitude of the a-wave was decreased significantly by 23.0% (P = 0.026) of the amplitude before the exposure, and the b-wave by 19.7% (P = 0.0478) following 1,000 flashes at 0.1 m but not by the other exposures. TUNEL-positive cells were present in the outer nuclear layer only after the extreme exposure, but no significant decrease in retinal thickness was seen under any condition. The fluorescein staining score and ERGs recovered to control levels within 1 week.
CONCLUSIONS: Light exposure to a photographic flash lamp does not induce damage to the cornea and retina except when they are exposed to 1,000 flashes at 0.1 m.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016736     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-006-9024-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  25 in total

1.  Endoillumination during vitrectomy and phototoxicity thresholds.

Authors:  P R van den Biesen; T Berenschot; R M Verdaasdonk; H van Weelden; D van Norren
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Retinal phototoxicity from the operating microscope. The role of inspired oxygen.

Authors:  G J Jaffe; A R Irvine; I S Wood; J W Severinghaus; G R Pino; C Haugen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Retinal sensitivity to damage from short wavelength light.

Authors:  W T Ham; H A Mueller; D H Sliney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Action spectrum for retinal injury from near-ultraviolet radiation in the aphakic monkey.

Authors:  W T Ham; H A Mueller; J J Ruffolo; D Guerry; R K Guerry
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Retinal damage by light in rats.

Authors:  W K Noell; V S Walker; B S Kang; S Berman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-10

6.  Retinal cell death by light damage.

Authors:  H Aonuma; R Yamazaki; I Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Functional changes in rod and cone pathways after photoreceptor loss in light-damaged rats.

Authors:  Tomomi Takahashi; Shigeki Machida; Tomoyuki Masuda; Yasuko Mukaida; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.424

8.  Hyperthermia protects against light damage in the rat retina.

Authors:  M F Barbe; M Tytell; D J Gower; W J Welch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Basic mechanisms underlying the production of photochemical lesions in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  W T Ham; H A Mueller; J J Ruffolo; J E Millen; S F Cleary; R K Guerry; D Guerry
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.424

10.  Effect of photic injury on the retinal tissues.

Authors:  M O Tso; B J Woodford
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.