AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Using modern echocardiography, we quantified the extent of global myocardial function and perfusion abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes and compared this with the hypothetically similar extent of impairments in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This case-control study (66 patients) compared four age-matched groups: control, type 2 diabetic, CAD, and diabetic subjects with CAD (DCAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction >50%. CAD patients had 1-2 vessel disease. Diastolic and systolic myocardial velocities were assessed with pulsed tissue Doppler. Global myocardial perfusion was assessed with contrast echocardiography as indices of capillary blood volume and myocardial blood flow at maximal vasodilatation. In CAD and DCAD patients, functional and perfusion parameters were additionally assessed in the territory with a normal coronary angiogram reading, providing a model for comparison with the global data from control and diabetic patients. RESULTS: Comparing diabetic with control subjects, myocardial velocity at early diastole was impaired (8.8+/-1.8 vs 10.1+/-1.7 cm/s; p=0.02) and correlated inversely with age, HbA(1c) and pulse pressure (R (2)=0.761). Capillary blood volume (16.6+/-5.0 vs 24.4+/-4.9%) and blood flow (56+/-35 vs 114+/-40) were decreased (p=0.001). In CAD patients, myocardial velocity at early diastole was similarly decreased (p=0.02). CAD and DCAD patients were receiving more cardiovascular preventive therapy for the same extent of impaired global perfusion as in the less extensively treated diabetes group without CAD (p<0.002), but had superior perfusion of the 'normal' coronary territory than that group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In patients with diabetes, global diastolic function and myocardial capillary blood volume and blood flow are impaired to the same extent as in patients with CAD. These impairments could form the basis of new therapeutic concepts.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Using modern echocardiography, we quantified the extent of global myocardial function and perfusion abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes and compared this with the hypothetically similar extent of impairments in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This case-control study (66 patients) compared four age-matched groups: control, type 2 diabetic, CAD, and diabetic subjects with CAD (DCAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction >50%. CAD patients had 1-2 vessel disease. Diastolic and systolic myocardial velocities were assessed with pulsed tissue Doppler. Global myocardial perfusion was assessed with contrast echocardiography as indices of capillary blood volume and myocardial blood flow at maximal vasodilatation. In CAD and DCADpatients, functional and perfusion parameters were additionally assessed in the territory with a normal coronary angiogram reading, providing a model for comparison with the global data from control and diabeticpatients. RESULTS: Comparing diabetic with control subjects, myocardial velocity at early diastole was impaired (8.8+/-1.8 vs 10.1+/-1.7 cm/s; p=0.02) and correlated inversely with age, HbA(1c) and pulse pressure (R (2)=0.761). Capillary blood volume (16.6+/-5.0 vs 24.4+/-4.9%) and blood flow (56+/-35 vs 114+/-40) were decreased (p=0.001). In CAD patients, myocardial velocity at early diastole was similarly decreased (p=0.02). CAD and DCADpatients were receiving more cardiovascular preventive therapy for the same extent of impaired global perfusion as in the less extensively treated diabetes group without CAD (p<0.002), but had superior perfusion of the 'normal' coronary territory than that group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In patients with diabetes, global diastolic function and myocardial capillary blood volume and blood flow are impaired to the same extent as in patients with CAD. These impairments could form the basis of new therapeutic concepts.
Authors: Helene Von Bibra; Inga S Thrainsdottir; Alexander Hansen; Vasilios Dounis; Klas Malmberg; Lars Rydén Journal: Diab Vasc Dis Res Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.291
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: M I Harris; K M Flegal; C C Cowie; M S Eberhardt; D E Goldstein; R R Little; H M Wiedmeyer; D D Byrd-Holt Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Mei Wang; Gabriel W K Yip; Angela Y M Wang; Yan Zhang; Pik Yuk Ho; Mui Kiu Tse; Peggo K W Lam; John E Sanderson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: F C Howarth; M A Qureshi; Z Hassan; D Isaev; K Parekh; A John; M Oz; H Raza; E Adeghate; T E Adrian Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 3.396
Authors: K A Salem; M A Qureshi; V Sydorenko; K Parekh; P Jayaprakash; T Iqbal; J Singh; M Oz; T E Adrian; F C Howarth Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 3.396