BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Experiments were designed to determine the mechanism of the relaxation induced by tamoxifen in porcine coronary arteries at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Porcine left circumflex coronary arteries were isolated and isometric tension was measured. [Ca2+]i in native endothelial cells of intact arteries was determined by a calcium fluorescence imaging technique and eNOS ser1177 phosphorylation was assayed by Western blotting. KEY RESULTS: Tamoxifen induced an endothelium-dependent relaxation that was antagonized by ICI 182,780 and abolished by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or 1H-[1,2,4]oxadizolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ). L-Arginine reversed the effect of L-NAME while indomethacin was without effect. Tamoxifen-induced relaxation was attenuated by charybdotoxin (CTX) plus apamin, ouabain or by incubation in a K+ -free solution. Moreover, tamoxifen triggered extracellular Ca2+ -dependent increases in endothelial [Ca2+]i and this effect was abolished by ICI 182,780. Endothelium-independent relaxation to sodium nitroprusside was also inhibited by ouabain or in a K+ -free solution. Furthermore, tamoxifen increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation at Ser-1177 and ICI 182,780 prevented this effect. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present results suggest that tamoxifen mainly induces endothelium-dependent relaxation and that endothelial nitric oxide (NO) is the primary mediator of this effect. NO-dependent responses may result from elevated [Ca2+]i in endothelial cells; an effect abolished by ICI 182,780. NO activates Na+/K+ -ATPase in vascular smooth muscle, leading to relaxation. These results suggest that tamoxifen is able to modulate eNOS phosphorylation directly.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Experiments were designed to determine the mechanism of the relaxation induced by tamoxifen in porcine coronary arteries at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Porcine left circumflex coronary arteries were isolated and isometric tension was measured. [Ca2+]i in native endothelial cells of intact arteries was determined by a calcium fluorescence imaging technique and eNOS ser1177 phosphorylation was assayed by Western blotting. KEY RESULTS:Tamoxifen induced an endothelium-dependent relaxation that was antagonized by ICI 182,780 and abolished by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or 1H-[1,2,4]oxadizolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ). L-Arginine reversed the effect of L-NAME while indomethacin was without effect. Tamoxifen-induced relaxation was attenuated by charybdotoxin (CTX) plus apamin, ouabain or by incubation in a K+ -free solution. Moreover, tamoxifen triggered extracellular Ca2+ -dependent increases in endothelial [Ca2+]i and this effect was abolished by ICI 182,780. Endothelium-independent relaxation to sodium nitroprusside was also inhibited by ouabain or in a K+ -free solution. Furthermore, tamoxifen increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation at Ser-1177 and ICI 182,780 prevented this effect. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present results suggest that tamoxifen mainly induces endothelium-dependent relaxation and that endothelial nitric oxide (NO) is the primary mediator of this effect. NO-dependent responses may result from elevated [Ca2+]i in endothelial cells; an effect abolished by ICI 182,780. NO activates Na+/K+ -ATPase in vascular smooth muscle, leading to relaxation. These results suggest that tamoxifen is able to modulate eNOS phosphorylation directly.
Authors: Bernard Fisher; John Bryant; James J Dignam; D Lawrence Wickerham; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Edwin R Fisher; Richard G Margolese; Lois Nesbitt; Soonmyung Paik; Thomas M Pisansky; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A L Cogolludo; F Pérez-Vizcaíno; F Zaragozá-Arnáez; M Ibarra; G López-López; V López-Miranda; J Tamargo Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Sandeep Gupta; Eugene Chough; Jennifer Daley; Peter Oates; Keith Tornheim; Neil B Ruderman; John F Keaney Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Fernando P Filgueira; Núbia S Lobato; Denise L Nascimento; Graziela S Ceravolo; Fernanda R C Giachini; Victor V Lima; Ana Paula Dantas; Zuleica B Fortes; R Clinton Webb; Rita C Tostes; Maria Helena C Carvalho Journal: Steroids Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Jie Hong Hu; Hao Wei; Mia Jaffe; Nathan Airhart; Liang Du; Stoyan N Angelov; James Yan; Julie K Allen; Inkyung Kang; Thomas N Wight; Kate Fox; Alexandra Smith; Rachel Enstrom; David A Dichek Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Jing Yan Tang; Shang Li; Zhen Hua Li; Zai Jun Zhang; Guang Hu; Lorita Chi Veng Cheang; Deepa Alex; Maggie Pui Man Hoi; Yiu Wa Kwan; Shun Wan Chan; George Pak Heng Leung; Simon Ming Yuen Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael J Shattock; Michela Ottolia; Donald M Bers; Mordecai P Blaustein; Andrii Boguslavskyi; Julie Bossuyt; John H B Bridge; Ye Chen-Izu; Colleen E Clancy; Andrew Edwards; Joshua Goldhaber; Jack Kaplan; Jerry B Lingrel; Davor Pavlovic; Kenneth Philipson; Karin R Sipido; Zi-Jian Xie Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Andrii Boguslavskyi; Sergiy Tokar; Oleksandra Prysyazhna; Olena Rudyk; David Sanchez-Tatay; Hamish A L Lemmey; Kim A Dora; Christopher J Garland; Helen R Warren; Alexander Doney; Colin N A Palmer; Mark J Caulfield; Julia Vlachaki Walker; Jacqueline Howie; William Fuller; Michael J Shattock Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690