Literature DB >> 17016226

Tumor necrosis has no prognostic value in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma.

Lawrence R Menendez1, Elke R Ahlmann, Kathleen Savage, Michael Cluck, Alexander N Fedenko.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of soft tissue sarcomas is controversial, and the correlation between local recurrence and survival is unclear. Histologic necrosis is a well-documented predictor of survival in patients with malignant bone tumors; however, the association is unknown in patients with soft tissue sarcomas. We assessed the prognostic significance of tumor necrosis for treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. We retrospectively collected data from 82 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Patients had wide resections if tumors were high-grade, deep to the investing fascia, and had clear margins. We quantified the amount of necrosis and analyzed the relationship with local recurrence and overall survival. At an average followup of 65 months (range, 24-154 months), the 5-year local recurrence rates for patients with less than 95% and 95% or greater necrosis were 20% and 33%, respectively. The overall 5-year survivorship rates for patients with less than 95% necrosis and 95% or greater necrosis were 82% and 78%, respectively. There was no difference in recurrence-free survival or overall patient survival based on the amount of histologic necrosis. Tissue necrosis from neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not seem to predict outcome in soft tissue sarcomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17016226     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238864.69486.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of the immune infiltrate in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the extremity and trunk in response to radiotherapy: Rationale for combination neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jen-Wei Tsai; Ali M Ali; Janice N Cormier; Andrew J Bishop; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Keila E Torres; Neeta Somaiah; Kelly K Hunt; Jennifer A Wargo; Alexander J Lazar; Wei-Lien Wang; Christina L Roland
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Validation of radiographic response evaluation criteria of preoperative chemotherapy for bone and soft tissue sarcomas: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Committee on Musculoskeletal Tumors Cooperative Study.

Authors:  Takafumi Ueda; Norifumi Naka; Nobuhito Araki; Takeshi Ishii; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuo Mochizuki; Tadao Tsuboyama; Junya Toguchida; Toshifumi Ozaki; Hiroaki Murata; Ikuo Kudawara; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Yukihide Iwamoto; Yasuo Yazawa; Kazuyoshi Kushida; Takanobu Otsuka; Keiji Sato
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Prognostic significance of treatment-induced pathologic necrosis in extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  John T Mullen; Francis J Hornicek; David C Harmon; Kevin A Raskin; Yen-Lin Chen; Jackie Szymonifka; Beow Y Yeap; Edwin Choy; Thomas F DeLaney; G Petur Nielsen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Histologic parameters predictive of disease outcome in women with advanced stage ovarian carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Damanzoopinder Samrao; Dan Wang; Faith Ough; Yvonne G Lin; Song Liu; Teodulo Menesses; Annie Yessaian; Nicole Turner; Tanja Pejovic; Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 5.  [Radiotherapy of soft tissue sarcoma--part of a multidisciplinary strategy].

Authors:  Hildegard Pape; Klaus Orth; Rainer Engers; Christiane Matuschek; Anja Müller; Karl-Axel Hartmann; Peter Arne Gerber; Guido Lammering; Daniel Habermehl; Roland Fenk; Wilfried Budach; Stephan Gripp; Matthias Peiper; Edwin Bölke
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Prognostic relevance of the mitotic count and the amount of viable tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary, localised, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  D Andreou; M Werner; D Pink; F Traub; M Schuler; G Gosheger; B Jobke; P Reichardt; P U Tunn
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Compared With Neoadjuvant Radiation Alone in the Management of High-Grade Soft Tissue Extremity Sarcomas.

Authors:  Sarah Z Hazell; Chen Hu; Sara R Alcorn; Kingsley O Asiedu; Gillian Pulido; Deborah A Frassica; Christian Meyer; Adam S Levin; Carol D Morris; Stephanie A Terezakis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-07

8.  Standardization of evaluation method and prognostic significance of histological response to preoperative chemotherapy in high-grade non-round cell soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Yoshinao Oda; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Takanori Hirose; Tadashi Hasegawa; Nobuyuki Hiruta; Masanori Hisaoka; Masato Yoshimoto; Hiroshi Otsuka; Hirofumi Bekki; Takeaki Ishii; Makoto Endo; Toshiyuki Kunisada; Toru Hiruma; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Hirohisa Katagiri; Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Akira Kawai; Robert Nakayama; Hiroyuki Kawashima; Satoshi Takenaka; Makoto Emori; Munenori Watanuki; Yukihiro Yoshida; Takeshi Okamoto; Junki Mizusawa; Haruhiko Fukuda; Toshifumi Ozaki; Yukihide Iwamoto; Takayuki Nojima
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.