Literature DB >> 17016220

Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in Olmsted County, Minnesota: a population-based study.

Julie E Adams1, John W Sperling, Cathy D Schleck, W Scott Harmsen, Robert H Cofield.   

Abstract

Most studies on shoulder arthroplasty include a diverse group of patients presenting to a tertiary care center. Little information is available regarding outcomes in a community setting. We reviewed 98 residents (110 shoulders) of Olmsted County, Minnesota who had shoulder arthroplasties from 1976 to 2000. There were 65 total shoulder arthroplasties and 45 humeral head replacements. The most common indications were osteoarthritis for total shoulder arthroplasties (48/65) and acute fracture for hemiarthroplasties (27/45). The Neer ratings were excellent or satisfactory in 92% of total shoulder arthroplasties and 56% of hemiarthroplasties. The 10-year survival rate was 96%. The mean postoperative active forward elevation was greater in patients who had a total shoulder arthroplasty (132 degrees) compared with a hemiarthroplasty (113 degrees), as was external rotation (total shoulder arthroplasties = 58 degrees, humeral head replacements = 38 degrees). The outcomes for total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty compared favorably with outcomes reported in the literature. There was a high rate of satisfactory or excellent results after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Hemiarthroplasty offered less satisfactory results, most likely related to the use of this procedure for trauma. This information will assist the community surgeon in counseling patients and weighing the risks and benefits of a shoulder arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17016220     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238870.99980.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Use of a custom alignment guide to improve glenoid component position in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Musa Citak; Darrick Lo; Aaron J Krych; Edward V Craig; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Future patient demand for shoulder arthroplasty by younger patients: national projections.

Authors:  Eric M Padegimas; Mitchell Maltenfort; Mark D Lazarus; Matthew L Ramsey; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Shoulder arthroplasty for locked anterior shoulder dislocation: a role for the reversed design.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Bradley S Schoch; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Brian P Chalmers; Cameron K Ledford; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Mark E Morrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in diabetic patients as assessed by peri-operative A1C.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Eric R Wagner; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Primary hemiarthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures].

Authors:  C Voigt; H Lill
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.004

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.