Literature DB >> 17016169

Current options in head and neck reconstruction.

Keith A Hurvitz1, Mark Kobayashi, Gregory R D Evans.   

Abstract

LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand current trends in the treatment of head and neck cancer. 2. Discuss the challenges of reconstructing head and neck defects 3. Understand the different reconstructive options available for specific anatomical regions of the head and neck.
BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery of the head and neck is both technically challenging and rewarding. In the past 20 years, significant advances in this field have improved surgical outcomes and patient function. The development and subsequent refinement of microvascular techniques, in particular, have been a major reason for this progression.
METHODS: In this article, the authors review the current options available in head and neck reconstruction. Because a large number of major craniocervicofacial defects result from oncologic resection, the authors have focused their review on this particular subject. By dividing their discussion into different anatomical sites, the authors hope to cover all major aspects of this broad topic.
RESULTS: Free tissue transfer has revolutionized head and neck reconstruction. The most widely used free flaps include the fibula, radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, and rectus abdominis. Restoration of both form and function is the ultimate goal.
CONCLUSIONS: Although defects of the head and neck region present a challenge, successful cosmetic and functional results have been achieved with both local and free tissue flaps. The flexibility of free tissue transfer, however, has dominated this area and continues to be the method of choice for reconstruction of sizable defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17016169     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237094.58891.fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  31 in total

1.  Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site in the Context of Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction.

Authors:  Khyati Jani; Nirav Maharaja; Nisha Rajrattansingh Akali; Deepak Balasubramanian; Janarthanan Ramu; Jimmy Mathew; Mohit Sharma; Krishnakumar Thankappan; Subramania Iyer
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-18

2.  Quality of life in patients after reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) versus the radial free forearm flap (RFFF).

Authors:  Jennifer L Spiegel; Yiannis Pilavakis; Bernhard G Weiss; Martin Canis; Christian Welz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  [Regenerative medicine in head and neck reconstructive surgery].

Authors:  F Riedel; U R Goessler; J Stern-Straeter; K Riedel; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  The osteo-muscular dorsal scapular (OMDS) flap. Anatomic basis of a new pedicled flap for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  C Vacher
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Bone Morphogenetic Protein-9-Stimulated Adipocyte-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitors Entrapped in a Thermoresponsive Nanocomposite Scaffold Facilitate Cranial Defect Repair.

Authors:  Cody S Lee; Elliot S Bishop; Zari Dumanian; Chen Zhao; Dongzhe Song; Fugui Zhang; Yunxiao Zhu; Guillermo A Ameer; Tong-Chuan He; Russell R Reid
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 6.  The value of postoperative anticoagulants to improve flap survival in the free radial forearm flap: a systematic review and retrospective multicentre analysis.

Authors:  J E Swartz; M C J Aarts; K M A Swart; J J Disa; M Gerressen; Y-R Kuo; M K Wax; W Grolman; W W Braunius
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  [Renaissance of pedicled flaps in oral and maxillofacial surgery].

Authors:  M Twieg; W Reich; R Dempf; A W Eckert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Functional and esthetic assessment of radial forearm flap donor site repaired with split thickness skin graft.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Lee; Mohammad S Alrashdan; Su-Gon Kim; Jae-Seok Rim; Samir Jabaiti; Myung-Jin Kim; Soung-Min Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Infrahyoid flap in oropharyngeal reconstruction following carcinoma resection: A study of 6 patients and literature review.

Authors:  Pedro Infante-Cossio; Eduardo Gonzalez-Cardero; Ricardo Lopez-Martos; Victoria Nuñez-Vera; Erika Olmos-Juarez; Alejandro Ruiz-Moya; Juan-Jose Haro-Luna; Eusebio Torres-Carrranza
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Free flap transfer in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a review of the current data.

Authors:  M Thorwarth; C Eulzer; R Bader; C Wolf; M Schmidt; S Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.