Literature DB >> 17015085

Affective and linguistic processing of speech prosody: DC potential studies.

Hans Pihan1.   

Abstract

Speech melody or prosody subserves linguistic, emotional, and pragmatic functions in speech communication. Prosodic perception is based on the decoding of acoustic cues with a predominant function of frequency-related information perceived as speaker's pitch. Evaluation of prosodic meaning is a cognitive function implemented in cortical and subcortical networks that generate continuously updated affective or linguistic speaker impressions. Various brain-imaging methods allow delineation of neural structures involved in prosody processing. In contrast to functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques, DC (direct current, slow) components of the EEG directly measure cortical activation without temporal delay. Activation patterns obtained with this method are highly task specific and intraindividually reproducible. Studies presented here investigated the topography of prosodic stimulus processing in dependence on acoustic stimulus structure and linguistic or affective task demands, respectively. Data obtained from measuring DC potentials demonstrated that the right hemisphere has a predominant role in processing emotions from the tone of voice, irrespective of emotional valence. However, right hemisphere involvement is modulated by diverse speech and language-related conditions that are associated with a left hemisphere participation in prosody processing. The degree of left hemisphere involvement depends on several factors such as (i) articulatory demands on the perceiver of prosody (possibly, also the poser), (ii) a relative left hemisphere specialization in processing temporal cues mediating prosodic meaning, and (iii) the propensity of prosody to act on the segment level in order to modulate word or sentence meaning. The specific role of top-down effects in terms of either linguistically or affectively oriented attention on lateralization of stimulus processing is not clear and requires further investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17015085     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56014-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  5 in total

1.  Right-hemispheric processing of non-linguistic word features: implications for mapping language recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Annette Baumgaertner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Auditory Processing Disorders in Elderly Persons vs. Linguistic and Emotional Prosody.

Authors:  Anna Rasmus; Aleksandra Błachnio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The Effects of Meaning and Emotional Content of a Sentence on the Kinematics of a Successive Motor Sequence Mimiking the Feeding of a Conspecific.

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Doriana De Marco; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-09

4.  Hemodynamic responses to emotional speech in two-month-old infants imaged using diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Shashank Shekhar; Ambika Maria; Kalle Kotilahti; Minna Huotilainen; Juha Heiskala; Jetro J Tuulari; Pauliina Hirvi; Linnea Karlsson; Hasse Karlsson; Ilkka Nissilä
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  "Hard to Say, Hard to Understand, Hard to Live": Possible Associations between Neurologic Language Impairments and Suicide Risk.

Authors:  Alessandra Costanza; Andrea Amerio; Andrea Aguglia; Luca Magnani; Gianluca Serafini; Mario Amore; Roberto Merli; Julia Ambrosetti; Guido Bondolfi; Lisa Marzano; Isabella Berardelli
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-11-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.