Literature DB >> 17014993

Trans-sinusoidal maxillary distraction in three cleft patients.

M Wenghoefer1, M Martini, N Nadjmi, F Schutyser, A K Jagtman, S Bergé.   

Abstract

The trans-sinusoidal maxillary distractor (TS-MD) was used to achieve maxillary advancement in three patients with repaired cleft lip and palate. After preoperative computer-aided planning of the distraction vectors, each TS-MD was bent on a stereolithographic model of the maxilla of the patient. The devices were intraoperatively positioned using a methyl-methacrylate template. After standard Le Fort I osteotomy the devices were intraorally activated. After distraction the devices remained in situ for 3 months as rigid internal fixation of the maxilla. All patients were successfully distracted according to protocol. Maxillary advancement was 12, 8 and 11 mm. In two patients, additional maxillary widening of 6 and 8 mm was achieved by choosing divergent distraction vectors. After distraction a clockwise rotation of the maxilla was observed in two patients. There was no relapse during the 3 months of consolidation and 12-month follow-up. The TS-MD allows not only distraction but also rigid internal fixation after distraction. It was easy to apply but difficult to remove. Owing to preoperative 3D planning of the distraction vectors, the results were predictable, but clockwise rotation of the maxilla during distraction should be considered in planning. The distractor did not interfere with function or social activities during distraction and retention periods. After removal it left no extraoral scars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17014993     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  3 in total

1.  Orthodontic considerations for maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing patients with cleft lip and palate using internal distractors.

Authors:  Adriana da Silveira; Pollyana Marques de Moura; Raymond J Harshbarger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Limitations of internal distraction devices in mature patients with cleft lip and palate and severe midface hypoplasia.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Alexander Busch; Andreas Bremerich
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-07-27

3.  Biomechanical comparison of two intraoperative mobilization techniques for maxillary distraction osteogenesis: Down-fracture versus non-down-fracture.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Eduardo Yugo Suzuki; Boonsiva Suzuki
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.