Literature DB >> 17014932

The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.

Marie Tarrant1, Aimee Knierim, Sasha K Hayes, James Ware.   

Abstract

Multiple-choice questions are a common assessment method in nursing examinations. Few nurse educators, however, have formal preparation in constructing multiple-choice questions. Consequently, questions used in baccalaureate nursing assessments often contain item-writing flaws, or violations to accepted item-writing guidelines. In one nursing department, 2770 MCQs were collected from tests and examinations administered over a five-year period from 2001 to 2005. Questions were evaluated for 19 frequently occurring item-writing flaws, for cognitive level, for question source, and for the distribution of correct answers. Results show that almost half (46.2%) of the questions contained violations of item-writing guidelines and over 90% were written at low cognitive levels. Only a small proportion of questions were teacher generated (14.1%), while 36.2% were taken from testbanks and almost half (49.4%) had no source identified. MCQs written at a lower cognitive level were significantly more likely to contain item-writing flaws. While there was no relationship between the source of the question and item-writing flaws, teacher-generated questions were more likely to be written at higher cognitive levels (p<0.001). Correct answers were evenly distributed across all four options and no bias was noted in the placement of correct options. Further training in item-writing is recommended for all faculty members who are responsible for developing tests. Pre-test review and quality assessment is also recommended to reduce the occurrence of item-writing flaws and to improve the quality of test questions.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17014932     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  12 in total

1.  Nonfunctional distractor analysis: An indicator for quality of Multiple choice questions.

Authors:  Madiha Sajjad; Samina Iltaf; Rehan Ahmed Khan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Marie Tarrant; James Ware; Ahmed M Mohammed
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality.

Authors:  Syed Haris Ali; Kenneth G Ruit
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-10

4.  Identification of technical item flaws leads to improvement of the quality of single best Multiple Choice Questions.

Authors:  Humaira Fayyaz Khan; Khalid Farooq Danish; Azra Saeed Awan; Masood Anwar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Farah Ahmad; Mohammad Irshad; Mahmoud Salah Khalil; Ghadeer Khalid Al-Shaikh; Sadiqa Syed; Abdulmajeed Abdurrahman Aldrees; Norah Alrowais; Shafiul Haque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluating the Quality of Multiple Choice Question in Paediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Examinations.

Authors:  Mawlood Kowash; Iyad Hussein; Manal Al Halabi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2019-09-08

7.  Contemplation on marking scheme for Type X multiple choice questions, and an illustration of a practically applicable scheme.

Authors:  Nazeem Ishrat Siddiqui; Vinayak H Bhavsar; Arnav V Bhavsar; Sukhwant Bose
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.200

8.  Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Mohammad Irshad; Shafiul Haque; Tauseef Ahmad; Kamran Sattar; Mahmoud Salah Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws.

Authors:  Mawlood Kowash; Hazza Alhobeira; Iyad Hussein; Manal Al Halabi; Saif Khan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12

10.  Evaluation of MCQs from MOOCs for common item writing flaws.

Authors:  Eamon Costello; Jane C Holland; Colette Kirwan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.