Literature DB >> 17014928

The Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*trACS): a multicenter registry of patients with suspicion of acute coronary syndromes reported using the standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department chest pain studies.

Christopher J Lindsell1, Venkataraman Anantharaman, Deborah Diercks, Jin Ho Han, James W Hoekstra, Judd E Hollander, J Douglas Kirk, Swee-Han Lim, W Frank Peacock, Brian Tiffany, Eric K Wilke, W Brian Gibler, Charles V Pollack.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Observational studies of well-described patient populations presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with suspicion of acute coronary syndrome are necessary to understand the relationships between patients' signs and symptoms, cardiac risk profile, test results, practice patterns, and outcomes. We describe the methods for data collection and the ED population enrolled in a multicenter registry of patients with chest pain.
METHODS: Patients older than 18 years, presenting to one of 8 EDs in the United States or 1 ED in Singapore, and with possible acute coronary syndrome were enrolled in the Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes between June 1999 and August 2001. Prospective data, including presenting signs and symptoms, ECG findings, and the ED physician's initial impression of risk, were systematically collected. Medical record review or daily follow-up was used to obtain cardiac biomarker results, invasive and noninvasive testing, treatments, procedures, and inhospital outcomes. Thirty-day outcomes were determined by telephone follow-up and medical record review.
RESULTS: The registry includes 15,608 patients, with 17,713 visits. Chest pain was the chief complaint in 71% of visits. The ECG was diagnostic of ischemia or infarction in 10.1% and positive cardiac biomarkers were observed in 10% of visits. Forty-three percent of patients were sent home directly from the ED. Of admitted patients, 5% died by 30 days, and 3% had documented coronary artery disease or had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days. For patients discharged directly from the ED, 0.4% died or had a documented myocardial infarction within 30 days. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, or a diagnosis of coronary artery disease was found in 0.5% of discharged patients.
CONCLUSION: A unique description of undifferentiated ED chest pain patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome is provided. The data set can be used to generate and explore hypotheses to improve understanding of the complex relationships between presentation, treatment, testing, intervention and outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17014928     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  24 in total

Review 1.  Chest pain triage: Current trends in the emergency departments in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew C DeLaney; Matthew Neth; Jared J Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies in emergency department patients with chest pain: an analysis of downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew J Foy; Guodong Liu; William R Davidson; Christopher Sciamanna; Douglas L Leslie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Evaluation of the value of rapid D-dimer test in conjunction with cardiac troponin I test for early risk stratification of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Shy-Shin Chang; Si-Huei Lee; Jiunn-Yih Wu; Hsiao-Chen Ning; Te-Fa Chiu; Feng-Lin Wang; Jung Hsiang Chen; Chih-Huang Li; Chien-Chang Lee; Rai-Chi Chan
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Use of cardiac biomarker testing in the emergency department.

Authors:  Anil N Makam; Oanh K Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in the BWH-TIMI ED chest pain study.

Authors:  Christian T Ruff; Marc P Bonaca; Joshua M Kosowsky; Michael J Conrad; Sabina A Murphy; Petr Jarolim; Sean M Donahoe; Michelle L O'Donoghue; David A Morrow
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Chest pain in lupus patients: the emergency department experience.

Authors:  Masoom Modi; Mariko L Ishimori; Vaneet K Sandhu; Daniel J Wallace; Michael H Weisman
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Comparison of clinical risk scores for triaging high-risk chest pain patients at the emergency department.

Authors:  Salah S Al-Zaiti; Ziad Faramand; Mohammad O Alrawashdeh; Susan M Sereika; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton Callaway
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 8.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing in routine practice: economic and organizational advantages.

Authors:  Claudio Galli; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-07

9.  Evaluating the optimal timing of revascularisation in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the TRANSIENT Trial.

Authors:  Jorrit Lemkes; Robin Nijveldt; Aernout M Beek; Paul Knaapen; Alexander Hirsch; Joost Meijers; Cor P Allaart; Albert van Rossum; Niels van Royen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of current and next-generation assays for cardiac troponin I in the BWH-TIMI ED Chest Pain Study.

Authors:  Marc P Bonaca; Christian T Ruff; Joshua Kosowsky; Michael J Conrad; Sabina A Murphy; Marc S Sabatine; Petr Jarolim; David A Morrow
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.