Literature DB >> 17014812

Sensory nerve injury after uterosacral ligament suspension.

Michael K Flynn1, Alison C Weidner, Cindy L Amundsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Uterosacral ligament suspension is a technique that is performed commonly to suspend the prolapsed vaginal apex. This case series describes our experience with the clinical evaluation and management of lower extremity sensory nerve symptoms after uterosacral ligament suspension. STUDY
DESIGN: Hospital and office medical records from our 2 institutions were reviewed from January 2002 to August 2005, and all women who underwent uterosacral ligament suspension through a vaginal approach were identified. Women with symptoms of buttock and posterior thigh pain during the 6-week postoperative period were identified, and detailed clinical information was abstracted from the charts.
RESULTS: From 182 uterosacral ligament suspension procedures, 7 women were identified. The age range was 42 to 70 years. Concurrent procedures included 6 vaginal hysterectomies, 5 anterior repairs, 4 posterior repairs, 2 slings, and 1 bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Within 24 hours of the surgical procedure, all the women experienced similar, substantial sharp buttock pain and numbness that radiated down the center of the posterior thigh to the popliteal fossa in 1 or both lower extremities. The ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suture was removed within 2 days of the procedure in 3 women who had immediate subjective reduction in their pain and complete resolution of pain by 6 weeks. The remaining 4 women were treated with gabapentin and narcotics. Three women had resolution of the pain by 12 to 14 weeks after the operation, and the last woman's pain resolved gradually by 6 months.
CONCLUSION: Women who undergo uterosacral ligament suspension are at risk of postoperative pain and numbness in a S2-4 distribution. These symptoms appear to be related to the placement of uterosacral ligament sutures and may be relieved either by prompt removal of the ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suture or with prolonged medical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17014812     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  15 in total

1.  Risks, symptoms, and management of pelvic nerve damage secondary to surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a report of 95 cases.

Authors:  Marc Possover; Nucelio Lemos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Anatomic variations of the pelvic floor nerves adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: a female cadaver study.

Authors:  George Lazarou; Bogdan A Grigorescu; Todd R Olson; Sherry A Downie; Kenneth Powers; Magdy S Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-11-24

3.  Etiology of post-uterosacral suspension neuropathies.

Authors:  M A Schön Ybarra; R E Gutman; D Rini; V L Handa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-28

4.  The uterosacral complex: ligament or neurovascular pathway? Anatomical and histological study of fetuses and adults.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Bernard Parratte; Francine Arbez-Gindre; Robert Maillet; Didier Riethmuller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-07-31

5.  Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium: managing complicated cases.

Authors:  Lunan Ji; Hanan Alshankiti; Christopher Chong; Rufus Cartwright; J Oliver Daly; Cara L Grimes; Ladin A Yurteri-Kaplan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks.

Authors:  Pedro A Maldonado; Mallory A Stuparich; Donald D McIntire; Clifford Y Wai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Mitchell B Berger; Bernard M Parratte; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Nerve injury during uterosacral ligament fixation: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Sherry A Downie; Todd R Olson; Magdy S Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-01-27

9.  Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Charles R Rardin; Elisabeth A Erekson; Vivian W Sung; Renee M Ward; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Lindsay C Turner; Erin S Lavelle; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.