| Literature DB >> 17014712 |
Jan Willem F Dierssen1, Noel F C C de Miranda, Arend Mulder, Marjo van Puijenbroek, Willem Verduyn, Frans H J Claas, Cornelis J H van de Velde, Gert Jan Fleuren, Cees J Cornelisse, Willem E Corver, Hans Morreau.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that alterations in Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I expression are frequent in colorectal tumors. This would suggest serious limitations for immunotherapy-based strategies involving T-cell recognition. Distinct patterns of HLA surface expression might conceal different immune escape mechanisms employed by the tumors and are worth further study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17014712 PMCID: PMC1599746 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
HLA genotype and phenotype of the 21 patients whose tumor tissue was used for flow cytometry.
| case | A.1 | A.2 | B.1 | B.2 |
| 40 | A2 | A3 | B15 | B38 |
| 43 | A2 | A3 | B18 | B49 |
| 44 | A2 | A24 | B7 | B55 |
| 45 | A1 | A2 | B8 | B62 |
| 48 | A3 | A3 | B7 | B62 |
| 55 | A1 | A3 | B8 | B62 |
| 56 | A1 | A30 | B8 | B51 |
| 58 | A2 | A32 | B44 | B60 |
| 59 | A1 | A2 | B7 | B62 |
| 61* | A2 | Bw4 | Bw6 | |
| 63* | A2 | Bw4 | Bw6 | |
| 69 | A2 | A24 | B7 | B39 |
| 106* | A3 | Bw4 | Bw6 | |
| 108 | A2 | A68 | B51 | B53 |
| 109* | A3 | Bw4 | Bw6 | |
| 110 | A1 | A23 | B8 | B50 |
| 120 | A2 | A3 | B7 | B44 |
| 122 | A1 | A24 | B44 | B56 |
| 124* | A2 | Bw4 | ||
| 179 | A3 | A3 | B7 | B35 |
| 191 | A2 | A24 | B15 | B40 |
A.1, A.2, B.1 and B.2 indicate the different HLA A and B alleles. * HLA genotype was not known prior to tumor resection, phenotype based on flow cytometry of vim+ cells with mouse monoclonal antibodies (Table 1).
Monoclonal anti-human antibodies used for flow cytometry analysis of HLA Class I expression
| mAb | species | isotype | HLA specificity | |
| 116.5.28 | M | IgG2a | Bw4 | |
| 126/39 | M | IgG3 | Bw6 | |
| A11.1M | M | IgG3 | A11, A24 | |
| BB7.2 | M | IgG2b | A2, Aw68 | |
| Bbm1 | M | IgG2b | β 2-m | |
| GAP.A3 | M | IgG2a | A3 | |
| MA2.1 | M | IgG1 | A2, B17 | |
| SFR8.B6 | R | IgG2b | Bw6 | |
| W6/32 | M | IgG2a | HLA -A,-B,-C | |
| BV 8E9 | H | IgM,κ | A28, A33, A34 | |
| BVK 5B10 | H | IgM,κ | B8 | |
| BVK 5C4 | H | IgM,κ | A80, A9 | |
| DMS 4G2 | H | IgG1,λ | B62, B35 | |
| FVS 4G4 | H | IgM,κ | B15, B17, B5, B37, B16, B18, B35 | |
| GK 31F12 | H | IgM,κ | B13 | |
| GV 5D1 | H | IgG1,λ | A1, A9 | |
| GVK 10H7 | H | IgM,λ | B5, B35, B18, B37, B38, B14, B77, B72, B53 | |
| GVK 4H11 | H | IgM,κ | B35, B62, B5, B16, B18, B37, B53, B70, B14 | |
| HDG 2G7 | H | IgG1,κ | A19, B17, B63, B47 | |
| HDG 8D9 | H | IgG1,λ | B51, B35 | |
| IN 2D12 | H | IgM,λ | B15, B35, B21, B70 | |
| JOK 3H5 | H | IgM,λ | B40, B21, B13, B12, B41, B70 | |
| KAL 3D5 | H | IgG1,λ | B51, B52, B77 | |
| KG 30A7 | H | IgM,λ | B27, B12, B14, B49 | |
| KLL 5E10 | H | IgG1,κ | B51, B52 | |
| MUS 4H4 | H | IgG1,λ | Bw4 | |
| Nie 44B8 | H | IgM,κ | A10 | |
| OK 1C9 | H | IgM,λ | A3, A11, A33, A31, A26 | |
| OK 2F3 | H | IgM,κ | A3 | |
| OK 2H12 | H | IgM,κ | A11, A3, A36, A32, A1 | |
| OK 3C8 | H | IgM,κ | A3, A11, A32, A36, A31 | |
| OK 4F10 | H | IgM,κ | A1, A3, A11, A31, A33, A26, A29, A30 | |
| OK 4F9 | H | IgM,κ | A1, A36, A3, A11, A34, A66, A26, A29, A30, A31, A33 | |
| OK 5A3 | H | IgM,λ | A1, A3, A11, A24, A36 | |
| OK 6H10 | H | IgM,κ | B15, B21, B56, B35, B72 | |
| OK 6H12 | H | IgM,κ | B21, B56, B70, B35, B62 | |
| ROU 9A6 | H | IgG3,λ | B12, B13, B40, B21, B41 | |
| SN 607D8 | H | IgG1,κ | A2, A28 | |
| SN 66E3 | H | IgM,κ | A2, A28 | |
| vD1F11 | H | IgM,λ | B62, B35, B57, B21, B56, B70, B55 | |
| VTM 1F11 | H | IgG1,κ | B27, B7, B60 | |
| VTM 4D9 | H | IgG1,κ | B7, B27 | |
| VTM 9A10 | H | IgG1,κ | B7, B27 | |
| WAR 5D5 | H | IgG1,κ | B7, B27, B42, B55 | |
| WIM 8E5 | H | IgG1,κ | A1, A10, A11, A9, A29, A30, A31, A33 | |
| WK 3D10 | H | IgM,κ | A2, A3, A23, A31, B7, B13, B17, B21, B40, B62 | |
| WK 4E3 | H | IgM,λ | A locus (not A1, A24) |
M, Mouse; H, Human; R, Rat; *, kindly donated by Dr. K. Gelsthorpe, Sheffield, U.K.; †, this paper.
Figure 1Membranous HLA class I expression analysis by four-color multiparameter flow cytometry of colorectal tumor cell suspensions. Fluorescence intensities of HLA class I with antibodies W6/32 (HC), BBM.1 (B2M), and alloantigen-specific antibodies against single A and B alleles (A.1 – B.2; see Table 2) are displayed in filled curves; corresponding negative controls are in non-filled curves. A, keratin positive (ker+) epithelial cells are distinguished from vimentin positive (vim+) stroma cells and infiltrating leukocytes. DNA ploidy analysis of case 122 reveals an aneuploid ker+ tumor cell fraction (black) compared to the normal diploid vim+ cells (light gray). B, Expression of all HLA molecules tested in case 122 of both ker+, tumor (black), and vim+ 'normal' (gray) cells. C, loss of the single A.1 (HLA-A2) allele was observed for tumor cells in case 191. D, loss of expression of all 4 HLA-A and -B alleles in tumor cells, but retention of HC and B2M, in case 179. The patient is homozygous for HLA-A3 (--;see Table 2).
Figure 2HLA phenotype alteration is associated with DNA ploidy of the cells within one tumor. Flow cytometry analysis of case 55 reveals a synchronous divergence of tumor cell populations with DNA ploidy and HLA expression. Keratin positive (ker+, black) epithelial cells are distinguished from vimentin positive (vim+, light gray) stroma cells and infiltrating leukocytes (a). Compared to the diploid vim+ cells (b), peri-diploid and aneuploid cell populations of ker+ cells are revealed (c). By plotting HLA expression to DNA content, 3 ker+ cell populations can be discriminated, including a HLA negative DNA diploid tumor cell population and a HLA positive aneuploid population (d).
Figure 3Conventional HLA immunohistochemistry of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Using HCA2 (HLA-A heavy chain), HC10 (HLA-B/C heavy chain) and anti-B2M antibodies, loss of HLA A and B expression as detected by flow cytometry (see Figures 1 and 2) could be confirmed. In the top panel, membranous staining (arrows) of B2M, HCA2, and HC10 is observed in the moderately differentiated sigmoid adenocarcinoma of case 122. In the bottom panel, loss of HLA-A and -B is illustrated for the mucinous caecum adenocarcinoma of case 179. Tumor B2M staining was mainly restricted to the cytoplasm (arrow), but some membranous expression of B2M was observed by FCM (see Figure 1). The HCA2 and HC10 staining was completely lost in tumor epithelium (t). Typically, the retained HLA expression of stroma cells (s) resulted in an inverted staining pattern in comparison to case 122. HE, haematoxylin and eosin staining. Pictures were made at 400 × magnification, HEs at 100×.