AIMS: Cardiac troponin levels predict mortality and cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients receiving dialysis and may be a useful clinical tool to stratify high-risk asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: The present study examined levels of troponins I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) in patients with chronic renal impairment, patients receiving dialysis and renal transplant recipients. Patients receiving dialysis on the renal transplant waiting list were compared with those excluded from the list based on medical criteria. Median levels were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and proportions compared by chi-squared. RESULTS: Median troponin levels were higher in patients on dialysis than transplant recipients. Comparing patients receiving dialysis not listed compared with those listed for renal transplant, median cTnI levels were significantly higher (0.03 versus 0.02 microg/L, P < 0.01) whereas median cTnT levels were not. Patients listed for transplantation were younger, had less clinical cardiovascular disease and lower C-reactive protein than those awaiting renal transplantation. The proportion of patients with elevated cTnT was not substantially different between patients awaiting renal transplantation (38%) and those excluded (52%). Levels of cTnI and cTnT were inversely related to renal function in predialysis and transplant patients, but were not related to time on dialysis for those receiving dialysis therapy. CONCLUSION: As patients awaiting renal transplantation are clinically screened for cardiovascular disease but have frequently elevated cardiac troponin levels, troponin may be a useful clinical tool to identify high-risk asymptomatic patients on dialysis prior to renal transplantation. The influence of renal function on the interpretation of cardiac troponin and risk prediction requires further evaluation.
AIMS: Cardiac troponin levels predict mortality and cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients receiving dialysis and may be a useful clinical tool to stratify high-risk asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: The present study examined levels of troponins I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) in patients with chronic renal impairment, patients receiving dialysis and renal transplant recipients. Patients receiving dialysis on the renal transplant waiting list were compared with those excluded from the list based on medical criteria. Median levels were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and proportions compared by chi-squared. RESULTS: Median troponin levels were higher in patients on dialysis than transplant recipients. Comparing patients receiving dialysis not listed compared with those listed for renal transplant, median cTnI levels were significantly higher (0.03 versus 0.02 microg/L, P < 0.01) whereas median cTnT levels were not. Patients listed for transplantation were younger, had less clinical cardiovascular disease and lower C-reactive protein than those awaiting renal transplantation. The proportion of patients with elevated cTnT was not substantially different between patients awaiting renal transplantation (38%) and those excluded (52%). Levels of cTnI and cTnT were inversely related to renal function in predialysis and transplant patients, but were not related to time on dialysis for those receiving dialysis therapy. CONCLUSION: As patients awaiting renal transplantation are clinically screened for cardiovascular disease but have frequently elevated cardiac troponin levels, troponin may be a useful clinical tool to identify high-risk asymptomatic patients on dialysis prior to renal transplantation. The influence of renal function on the interpretation of cardiac troponin and risk prediction requires further evaluation.
Authors: Michael Walsh; Chew-Yin Wang; Gracie S Y Ong; Alvin S B Tan; Marzida Mansor; Ina I Shariffuddin; Noorjahan H M Hashim; Hou Yee Lai; A Wahab Undok; Ushananthini N Kolandaivel; Vasanthan Vajiravelu; Amit X Garg; Meaghan Cuerden; Gordon Guyatt; Lehana Thabane; John Mooney; Vincent Lee; Clara Chow; Phillip J Devereaux Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Martina Montagnana; Giuseppe Lippi; Nicola Tessitore; Gian Luca Salvagno; Giovanni Targher; Matteo Gelati; Antonio Lupo; Gian Cesare Guidi Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.352