Stine Jacobsen1, Maj Halling Thomsen, Simone Nanni. 1. Department of Large Animal Sciences, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Dyrlaegevej 48, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine serum amyloid A (SAA) concentrations in serum and synovial fluid from healthy horses and horses with joint disease and assess the effect of repeated arthrocentesis on SAA concentrations in synovial fluid. Animals-10 healthy horses and 21 horses with various types of joint disease. PROCEDURES: Serum and synovial fluid samples were obtained from each horse. In 5 of the 10 healthy horses, arthrocentesis was repeated 9 times. Concentrations of SAA were determined via immunoturbidometry. RESULTS: Serum and synovial fluid SAA concentrations were less than the assay detection limit in healthy horses and did not change in response to repeated arthrocentesis. Synovial fluid SAA concentrations were significantly higher in horses with suspected bacterial joint contamination or infectious arthritis, or tenovaginitis than in healthy controls, and serum concentrations were significantly higher in horses with infectious conditions than in the other groups. Neither serum nor synovial fluid SAA concentrations in horses with low-inflammation joint conditions differed significantly from those in healthy controls. Concentrations of SAA and total protein in synovial fluid were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Synovial fluid SAA concentration was a good marker of infectious arthritis and tenovaginitis and appeared to reflect changes in inflammatory activity. The advantages of use of SAA as a marker include the ease and speed of measurement and the fact that concentrations in synovial fluid were not influenced by repeated arthrocentesis in healthy horses. Further study of the SAA response in osteoarthritic joints to assess its usefulness in diagnosis and monitoring of osteoarthritis is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To determine serum amyloid A (SAA) concentrations in serum and synovial fluid from healthy horses and horses with joint disease and assess the effect of repeated arthrocentesis on SAA concentrations in synovial fluid. Animals-10 healthy horses and 21 horses with various types of joint disease. PROCEDURES: Serum and synovial fluid samples were obtained from each horse. In 5 of the 10 healthy horses, arthrocentesis was repeated 9 times. Concentrations of SAA were determined via immunoturbidometry. RESULTS: Serum and synovial fluid SAA concentrations were less than the assay detection limit in healthy horses and did not change in response to repeated arthrocentesis. Synovial fluid SAA concentrations were significantly higher in horses with suspected bacterial joint contamination or infectious arthritis, or tenovaginitis than in healthy controls, and serum concentrations were significantly higher in horses with infectious conditions than in the other groups. Neither serum nor synovial fluid SAA concentrations in horses with low-inflammation joint conditions differed significantly from those in healthy controls. Concentrations of SAA and total protein in synovial fluid were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Synovial fluid SAA concentration was a good marker of infectious arthritis and tenovaginitis and appeared to reflect changes in inflammatory activity. The advantages of use of SAA as a marker include the ease and speed of measurement and the fact that concentrations in synovial fluid were not influenced by repeated arthrocentesis in healthy horses. Further study of the SAA response in osteoarthritic joints to assess its usefulness in diagnosis and monitoring of osteoarthritis is warranted.
Authors: Marianne O Hesselager; Marius C Codrea; Zhi Sun; Eric W Deutsch; Tue B Bennike; Allan Stensballe; Louise Bundgaard; Robert L Moritz; Emøke Bendixen Journal: Proteomics Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Louise Bundgaard; Stine Jacobsen; Mette A Sørensen; Zhi Sun; Eric W Deutsch; Robert L Moritz; Emøke Bendixen Journal: Proteomics Date: 2014-02-16 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Agnieszka Turło; Anna Cywińska; Michał Czopowicz; Lucjan Witkowski; Artur Niedźwiedź; Malwina Słowikowska; Hieronim Borowicz; Anna Jaśkiewicz; Anna Winnicka Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katja F Duesterdieck-Zellmer; Lindsey Moneta; Jesse F Ott; Maureen K Larson; Elena M Gorman; Barbara Hunter; Christiane V Löhr; Mark E Payton; Jeffrey T Morré; Claudia S Maier Journal: PeerJ Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: T H Pihl; E Scheepers; M Sanz; A Goddard; P Page; N Toft; P H Andersen; S Jacobsen Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: N Ardanaz; F J Vázquez; A Romero; A R Remacha; L Barrachina; A Sanz; B Ranera; A Vitoria; J Albareda; M Prades; P Zaragoza; I Martín-Burriel; C Rodellar Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 2.741