Literature DB >> 17013998

Development and validation of a simple tape-based measurement tool for recording cervical rotation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: comparison with a goniometer-based approach.

Walter P Maksymowych1, Catherine Mallon, Rhonda Richardson, Barbara Conner-Spady, Edwin Jauregui, Cecilia Chung, Lisa Zappala, Kevin Pile, Anthony S Russell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a tape-based tool for measuring cervical mobility in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with the widely practiced goniometer-based approach.
METHODS: We developed a novel tape-based approach to measurement of lateral cervical rotation of the neck that is minimally affected by flexion/extension movements of the neck. This requires measurement of the difference between a mark at the suprasternal notch and the tragus of the ear. Rotation score is measured in centimeters and constitutes the difference in length between the 2 extremes of cervical rotation (http://www.arthritisdoctors.org/researcher.html). We assessed the tape-based and goniometer-based methods in a total of 263 patients from 3 countries, Canada (n = 205), Australia (n = 29), and Colombia (n = 29), that included patients from community and tertiary-based practice. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed in a subset of 44 patients by ANOVA and a 2-way mixed effects model. The Bath AS Disease Activity (BASDAI) and Function (BASFI) Indices, and the modified Stoke AS Spinal Score (mSASSS), were also recorded to assess construct validity by correlation coefficient and regression analysis. Responsiveness was assessed in a subset of 33 patients that were either randomized to anti-tumor necrosis factor-a therapy:placebo (n = 22) or received open label infliximab (n = 4) or pamidronate (n = 7) over a period of 24 weeks.
RESULTS: Scores obtained with the tape-based method were normally distributed, while those obtained using the goniometer were skewed towards normal values. Reliability for the goniometer-based approach was excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.90] and very good for the tape-based approach (ICC > 0.80). Significant correlations were noted between age, disease duration, function and structural damage scores, and scores obtained with both methods. Responsiveness was high using raw scores obtained with the goniometer (standardized response mean > 0.80) but was not evident when the grading scheme proposed for the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) was employed.
CONCLUSION: The tape-based approach we describe provides a simple, feasible, and reliable index of cervical rotation that is comparable to the information obtained from the use of a goniometer. If the goniometer-based approach is used, raw scores should be used in the calculation of responsiveness rather than the grading scheme suggested in the BASMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17013998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  4 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of CODA motion analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in patients with cervical spondylosis and anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Zhongyang Gao; Hui Song; Fenggang Ren; Yuhuan Li; Dong Wang; Xijing He
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Smartphone Application with Virtual Reality Goggles for the Reliable and Valid Measurement of Active Craniocervical Range of Motion.

Authors:  Ke-Vin Chang; Wei-Ting Wu; Mei-Chu Chen; Yi-Chi Chiu; Der-Sheng Han; Chih-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-10

3.  Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity.

Authors:  Minshan Feng; Long Liang; Wu Sun; Guang Wei Liu; Xunlu Yin; Tao Han; Xu Wei; Liguo Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chantal H P de Koning; Sylvia P van den Heuvel; J Bart Staal; Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman; Erik J M Hendriks
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.