Literature DB >> 17013685

Immunohistochemical expression of p16INK4A, Ki-67, and Mcm2 proteins in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: prognostic implications and correlations with risk stratification of NIH consensus criteria.

Hsuan-Ying Huang1, Wen-Wei Huang, Ching-Nan Lin, Hock-Liew Eng, Shau-Hsuan Li, Chien-Feng Li, David Lu, Shih-Chen Yu, Ching-Yeh Hsiung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inactivation of p16(INK4A) promotes G1/S progression of cell cycle. Minichromosome maintenance protein-2 (Mcm2), a novel cell proliferation marker, is known to better correlate with clinical outcomes than Ki-67 in many carcinomas. Since gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) sometimes remains challenging in prognostication, we analyzed the utility of these three markers in GISTs.
METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed in tissue microarrays of 277 primary GISTs and correlated with NIH consensus criteria and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: The increment of NIH risk levels significantly correlated with increasing labeling indices (LI) of both Ki-67 (P <.001) and Mcm2 (P <.001) and loss of p16(INK4A) expression (P <.035). However, the latter aberration did occur in 23% of very low/low-risk GISTs. The relationship between Mcm2 and Ki-67 LIs could be modeled as linear (P <.001, r = 0.697), while Mcm2 LI was considerably higher (P <.001) with a stepwise escalation related to risk levels. Ki-67 LI >5% (P <.0001) and Mcm2 LI >10% (P <.0001) were strongly predictive of inferior disease-specific survival (DSS), while aberrant loss of p16(INK4A) only reached a trend (P = .0954). In multivariate analyses, independent adverse factors of DSS were high-risk category (RR = 16.93, P <.0001), metastatic disease (RR = 4.12, P = .0015), Ki-67 LI >5% (RR = 3.55, P = .001), and presence of epithelioid histology (RR = 2.17, P = .0308).
CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic efficacy of NIH consensus criteria is substantiated. P16(INK4A) deregulation can occur early in GIST tumorigenesis and marginally correlates with patient survival. Despite Ki-67 LI being an independent prognosticator, simultaneous detection of Mcm2 is recommended as a prognostic adjunct of GISTs, given its better sensitivity and stepwise escalation with increasing risk levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17013685     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9188-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Loss of chromosome 9p21 and decreased p16 expression correlate with malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Hui Cao; Ming Wang; Wen-Yi Zhao; Zhi-Yong Shen; Dan-Ping Shen; Xing-Zhi Ni; Zhi-Yong Wu; Yan-Ying Shen; Yan-Yan Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Optimal Surgical Treatment of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Seung Jae Lee; Ki Byung Song; Young-Joo Lee; Song Cheol Kim; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Sang Hyun Shin; Jae Woo Kwon; Seung Hyun Hwang; Chung Hyeun Ma; Gui Suk Park; Ye Jong Park; Kwang-Min Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Clinicopathologic analysis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in duodenum and small intestine.

Authors:  In Woong Han; Jin-Young Jang; Kyoung Bun Lee; Mee Joo Kang; Wooil Kwon; Jae Woo Park; Ye Rim Chang; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Kyu Joo Park; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prognostic significance of PTEN, Ki-67 and CD44s expression patterns in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Liang; Xiang-Hong Li; Wen-Mei Li; You-Yong Lu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Evaluation of malignancy using Ki-67, p53, EGFR and COX-2 expressions in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Jing Jiang; Mei-Shan Jin; Jian Suo; Yin-Ping Wang; Liang He; Xue-Yuan Cao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  MCM-2 and MCM-5 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma: clinical significance and comparison with Ki-67 proliferative marker.

Authors:  Constantinos Giaginis; Athina Giagini; Gerasimos Tsourouflis; Elisavet Gatzidou; Emmanuel Agapitos; Gregorios Kouraklis; Stamatios Theocharis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of gastointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yu Na Kang; Hye Ra Jung; Ilseon Hwang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  p16 expression differentiates high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor and predicts poor outcome.

Authors:  Michael Schmieder; Sebastian Wolf; Bettina Danner; Susanne Stoehr; Markus S Juchems; Peter Wuerl; Doris Henne-Bruns; Uwe Knippschild; Cornelia Hasel; Klaus Kramer
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  High density DNA array analysis reveals distinct genomic profiles in a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Martin G Belinsky; Yuliya V Skorobogatko; Lori Rink; Jianming Pei; Kathy Q Cai; Lisa A Vanderveer; David Riddell; Erin Merkel; Chi Tarn; Burton L Eisenberg; Margaret von Mehren; Joseph R Testa; Andrew K Godwin
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jason S Gold; Mithat Gönen; Antonio Gutiérrez; Javier Martín Broto; Xavier García-del-Muro; Thomas C Smyrk; Robert G Maki; Samuel Singer; Murray F Brennan; Cristina R Antonescu; John H Donohue; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.