Dan L Dumitrascu1, Liliana David, Manfred Singer. 1. 3rd Medical Clinic, Iuliu Hatieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Str. Croitorilor no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. ddumitrascu@cluj.astral.ro
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder in Romania, managed frequently by General Practitioners (GPs). It is necessary to assess the knowledge of GPs on IBS. A preliminary investigation was carried out in two Romanian counties. METHODS: One hundred GPs were invited to a two hour, free, updating course on IBS. The participants were asked to fill a questionnaire before and after the course which comprised questions about medical experience, demography, and several multiple-choice questions about GPs opinions and awareness. The final question assessed the estimated prevalence of IBS in the practice. RESULTS: Full responses to both questionnaires were obtained from all attending GPs (n=88). They were 25 males: 63 females, with working experience between 3 and 41 years (mean +/- SD: 24 +/- 11). Apart from 2 (2.4%) who indicated that IBS is a motility disorder (opinion revised after the course), all other GPs considered IBS as a functional disorder. All (100%) opted for the necessity of colonoscopy to diagnose IBS. 98.8% indicated the use of Rome II criteria for the diagnosis of IBS (this survey was done before the availability of Rome III but their advent was mentioned). All (100%) had participated in previous lectures or courses on IBS. 58 (66%) reported the prevalence of IBS in their practice between 1-10%; 16 (18%) between 10-25%; 11 (12.5%) between 25-33%; 3 (3.5%) reported <1%. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated GPs seem to be well trained in recognizing IBS. The majority (66%) estimated the prevalence of this condition as 1-10% in their practice.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder in Romania, managed frequently by General Practitioners (GPs). It is necessary to assess the knowledge of GPs on IBS. A preliminary investigation was carried out in two Romanian counties. METHODS: One hundred GPs were invited to a two hour, free, updating course on IBS. The participants were asked to fill a questionnaire before and after the course which comprised questions about medical experience, demography, and several multiple-choice questions about GPs opinions and awareness. The final question assessed the estimated prevalence of IBS in the practice. RESULTS: Full responses to both questionnaires were obtained from all attending GPs (n=88). They were 25 males: 63 females, with working experience between 3 and 41 years (mean +/- SD: 24 +/- 11). Apart from 2 (2.4%) who indicated that IBS is a motility disorder (opinion revised after the course), all other GPs considered IBS as a functional disorder. All (100%) opted for the necessity of colonoscopy to diagnose IBS. 98.8% indicated the use of Rome II criteria for the diagnosis of IBS (this survey was done before the availability of Rome III but their advent was mentioned). All (100%) had participated in previous lectures or courses on IBS. 58 (66%) reported the prevalence of IBS in their practice between 1-10%; 16 (18%) between 10-25%; 11 (12.5%) between 25-33%; 3 (3.5%) reported <1%. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated GPs seem to be well trained in recognizing IBS. The majority (66%) estimated the prevalence of this condition as 1-10% in their practice.
Authors: M Bellini; D Gambaccini; S Salvadori; C Tosetti; M T Urbano; F Costa; P Monicelli; M G Mumolo; A Ricchiuti; N De Bortoli; S Marchi Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 3.781