Literature DB >> 17012497

Formal and effective autonomy in healthcare.

A P Schwab1.   

Abstract

This essay lays the groundwork for a novel conception of autonomy that may be called "effective autonomy"-a conception designed to be genuinely action guiding in bioethics. As empirical psychology research on the heuristics and biases approach shows, decision making commonly fails to correspond to people's desires because of the biases arising from bounded cognition. People who are classified as autonomous on contemporary philosophical accounts may fail to be effectively autonomous because their decisions are uncoupled from their autonomous desires. Accordingly, continuing attempts to value patient autonomy must go beyond existing philosophical conceptions of autonomy to consider the background conditions of human decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17012497      PMCID: PMC2563308          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: the 'micro-certainty, macro-uncertainty' phenomenon.

Authors:  A O Baumann; R B Deber; G G Thompson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment.

Authors:  D J Koehler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Both under-nutrition and obesity increase morbidity following liver transplantation.

Authors:  A M Hade; A M Shine; N P Kennedy; P A McCormick
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2003-05

6.  The effect of body mass index on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  E Everett; H Tamimi; B Greer; E Swisher; P Paley; L Mandel; B Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.482

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  To tell the truth, the whole truth, may do patients harm: the problem of the nocebo effect for informed consent.

Authors:  Rebecca Erwin Wells; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  (Re)Conceptualising 'good' proxy decision-making for research: the implications for proxy consent decision quality.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.834

3.  Shared decision-making and patient autonomy.

Authors:  Lars Sandman; Christian Munthe
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2009-08-22

Review 4.  Involvement of ICU families in decisions: fine-tuning the partnership.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Marine Chaize; Nancy Kentish-Barnes
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 5.  Reconciling the theory and reality of shared decision-making: A "matching" approach to practitioner leadership.

Authors:  Stephen L Brown; Peter Salmon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Definition of Terms Used in Limitation of Treatment and Providing Palliative Care at the End of Life: The Indian Council of Medical Research Commission Report.

Authors:  Naveen Salins; Roop Gursahani; Roli Mathur; Shivakumar Iyer; Stanley Macaden; Nagesh Simha; Raj Kumar Mani; M R Rajagopal
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.