R S Wilson1, S E Arnold, J A Schneider, Y Tang, D A Bennett. 1. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, 600 South Paulina, Suite 1038, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. rwilson@rush.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction is common in old age, but its basis is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that difficulty in identifying odours in old age is related to the accumulation of Alzheimer's disease pathology. METHODS: As part of the Rush Memory and Aging Project, participants completed the 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test, a standard measure of odour identification. During a mean (standard deviation (SD)) of 2.2 (1.2) years of follow-up (range 0.2-4.9), 166 people died, with brain autopsies performed on 129 (77.7%) people and neuropathological examinations completed on 77 (mean (SD) age at death 87.5 (5.9) years; median postmortem interval 6.1 h). From a uniform postmortem examination of multiple brain regions, summary measures of plaque and tangle pathology were derived on the basis of silver staining, and those of amyloid beta burden, tangle density and Lewy bodies on the basis of immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Odour identification performance ranged from 0 to 12 correct (mean (SD) 8.0 (2.6)). In analyses adjusted for age, sex and education, a composite measure of plaques and tangles accounted for >12% of the variation in odour identification. The association remained after controlling for dementia or semantic memory. Density of tau tangles was inversely related to odour identification. A similar effect for amyloid burden was attenuated after controlling for tangles. The association with odour identification was robust for tangles in the entorhinal cortex and CA1/subiculum area of the hippocampus, but not for tangles in other cortical sites. Lewy bodies, identified in 12.5%, were not related to odour identification, probably partly due to to their relative infrequency. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that difficulty in identifying familiar odours in old age is partly due to the accumulation of neurofibrillar pathology in central olfactory regions.
BACKGROUND:Olfactory dysfunction is common in old age, but its basis is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that difficulty in identifying odours in old age is related to the accumulation of Alzheimer's disease pathology. METHODS: As part of the Rush Memory and Aging Project, participants completed the 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test, a standard measure of odour identification. During a mean (standard deviation (SD)) of 2.2 (1.2) years of follow-up (range 0.2-4.9), 166 peopledied, with brain autopsies performed on 129 (77.7%) people and neuropathological examinations completed on 77 (mean (SD) age at death 87.5 (5.9) years; median postmortem interval 6.1 h). From a uniform postmortem examination of multiple brain regions, summary measures of plaque and tangle pathology were derived on the basis of silver staining, and those of amyloid beta burden, tangle density and Lewy bodies on the basis of immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Odour identification performance ranged from 0 to 12 correct (mean (SD) 8.0 (2.6)). In analyses adjusted for age, sex and education, a composite measure of plaques and tangles accounted for >12% of the variation in odour identification. The association remained after controlling for dementia or semantic memory. Density of tau tangles was inversely related to odour identification. A similar effect for amyloid burden was attenuated after controlling for tangles. The association with odour identification was robust for tangles in the entorhinal cortex and CA1/subiculum area of the hippocampus, but not for tangles in other cortical sites. Lewy bodies, identified in 12.5%, were not related to odour identification, probably partly due to to their relative infrequency. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that difficulty in identifying familiar odours in old age is partly due to the accumulation of neurofibrillar pathology in central olfactory regions.
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Steven E Arnold; Julie A Schneider; Jeremiah F Kelly; Yuxiao Tang; David A Bennett Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2006-09-13 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Matthias H Tabert; Xinhua Liu; Richard L Doty; Michael Serby; Diana Zamora; Gregory H Pelton; Karen Marder; Mark W Albers; Yaakov Stern; D P Devanand Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Julie A Schneider; Julia L Bienias; David W Gilley; David E Kvarnberg; Elliott J Mufson; David A Bennett Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: R H McShane; Z Nagy; M M Esiri; E King; C Joachim; N Sullivan; A D Smith Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: S Christen-Zaech; R Kraftsik; O Pillevuit; M Kiraly; R Martins; K Khalili; J Miklossy Journal: Can J Neurol Sci Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle; Aron S Buchman; Lei Yu; Steven E Arnold; David A Bennett Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Steven E Arnold; Edward B Lee; Paul J Moberg; Lauren Stutzbach; Hala Kazi; Li-Ying Han; Virginia M Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Johnny Jarnagin; Yorghos Tripodis; Michael Platt; Brett Martin; Christine E Chaisson; Christine M Baugh; Nathan G Fritts; Robert C Cantu; Robert A Stern Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Mary E Fischer; A Alex Pinto; Yanjun Chen; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; James S Pankow; Adam J Paulsen; Dayna S Dalton; Ted S Tweed Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Carla R Schubert; Lakeesha L Carmichael; Claire Murphy; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 5.562