Literature DB >> 17012049

Neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: opportunities to assess tumour response.

Robin L Jones1, Ian E Smith.   

Abstract

Primary, preoperative, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was introduced in the early 1970s as part of an integrated therapeutic approach to treat inoperable locally advanced breast cancer. The approach resulted in high responses, and sufficient downstaging to allow mastectomy in some patients. In addition, a small number of pathological complete responders were reported. Gradually, the idea of preoperative chemotherapy was extended to include patients with large but operable early-stage breast cancer, with the possibility in some cases of downstaging the primary tumour to avoid mastectomy, and to allow breast-conserving surgery to be done. This approach allows the tumour to be used as a measure of treatment response in vivo. More recently, the possibility has opened up for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to provide information on the use of clinical, pathological, and molecular endpoints, which can be used as surrogate markers to predict long-term outcome in the adjuvant setting. In addition, the anatomical accessibility of the breast provides the potential for serial biopsies to investigate molecular changes during treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17012049     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70906-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  18 in total

1.  Serum DNA methylation for monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Ayelet Avraham; Ronit Uhlmann; Aino Shperber; Miriam Birnbaum; Judith Sandbank; Avishay Sella; Saraswati Sukumar; Ella Evron
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging correlates with final pathological response in breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Albert E Cerussi; Vaya W Tanamai; David Hsiang; John Butler; Rita S Mehta; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Frequent optical imaging during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveals dynamic tumor physiology in an individual patient.

Authors:  Albert E Cerussi; Vaya W Tanamai; Rita S Mehta; David Hsiang; John Butler; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Metabolomics approach for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Siwei Wei; Lingyan Liu; Jian Zhang; Jeremiah Bowers; G A Nagana Gowda; Harald Seeger; Tanja Fehm; Hans J Neubauer; Ulrich Vogel; Susan E Clare; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Metabolic biomarker signature for predicting the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojie Lin; Rui Xu; Siying Mao; Yuzhu Zhang; Yan Dai; Qianqian Guo; Xue Song; Qingling Zhang; Li Li; Qianjun Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

6.  Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and clinical outcome in primary human breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonia Sophie Wenners; Keyur Mehta; Sibylle Loibl; Hyerim Park; Berit Mueller; Norbert Arnold; Sigrid Hamann; Joerg Weimer; Beyhan Ataseven; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Christian Schem; Christoph Mundhenke; Fariba Khandan; Christoph Thomssen; Walter Jonat; Hans-Juergen Holzhausen; Gunther von Minckwitz; Carsten Denkert; Maret Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Designing adjuvant treatment based on biological measurements in the neoadjuvant setting.

Authors:  Ian E Smith; Aekaterini Kotsori
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  CD133 is a useful surrogate marker for predicting chemosensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Aomatsu; Masakazu Yashiro; Shinichiro Kashiwagi; Tsutomu Takashima; Tetsuro Ishikawa; Masahiko Ohsawa; Kenichi Wakasa; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neoadjuvant/presurgical treatments.

Authors:  Ian E Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  A pilot study to assess the feasibility of evaluation of markers of response to chemotherapy at one day & 21 days after first cycle of chemotherapy in carcinoma of breast: a prospective non-randomized observational study.

Authors:  Shekhar Sharma; K R Hiran; K Pavithran; D K Vijaykumar
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.