PURPOSE: To measure the actual dose of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) delivered during intravitreal injection performed by several common techniques. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: A 0.1-ml, 40-mg vial of TA (Kenalog-40; Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Peapack, New Jersey, USA) was prepared according to one of four protocols and the mass determined after drying overnight on waxed paper. In group 1, a 0.1-ml aliquot of TA was dispensed with a 30-gauge needle after shaking the vial 10 or 30 times. Group 2 used a 27-gauge needle. In group 3, the supernatant was removed from the crystals. Group 4 passed the suspension through a 0.2-microm micropore filter and rinsed the crystals with saline. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between 30- or 27-gauge needles (P = 0.83, t test) or between shaking the vial 10 or 30 times before withdrawing the drug (P = 0.99). A statistically significant difference (t test, P = 0.001) was found between TA delivered from the initial 60% of each syringe (mean +/- SD, 2.7 +/- 1.0 mg) to that drawn from the last 40% of each syringe (7.8 +/- 3.6 mg). Group 3 had a mean weight of 32.1 +/- 7.0 mg and group 4, 10.6 +/- 2.1 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to achieve a 4.0-mg dose of TA, regardless of method used, are variable and inconsistent. Injecting through a small-gauge needle appears to concentrate the remaining suspension. Techniques to concentrate TA or remove aqueous preservatives by filtering effectively increase the concentration, but these results are variable.
PURPOSE: To measure the actual dose of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) delivered during intravitreal injection performed by several common techniques. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: A 0.1-ml, 40-mg vial of TA (Kenalog-40; Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Peapack, New Jersey, USA) was prepared according to one of four protocols and the mass determined after drying overnight on waxed paper. In group 1, a 0.1-ml aliquot of TA was dispensed with a 30-gauge needle after shaking the vial 10 or 30 times. Group 2 used a 27-gauge needle. In group 3, the supernatant was removed from the crystals. Group 4 passed the suspension through a 0.2-microm micropore filter and rinsed the crystals with saline. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between 30- or 27-gauge needles (P = 0.83, t test) or between shaking the vial 10 or 30 times before withdrawing the drug (P = 0.99). A statistically significant difference (t test, P = 0.001) was found between TA delivered from the initial 60% of each syringe (mean +/- SD, 2.7 +/- 1.0 mg) to that drawn from the last 40% of each syringe (7.8 +/- 3.6 mg). Group 3 had a mean weight of 32.1 +/- 7.0 mg and group 4, 10.6 +/- 2.1 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to achieve a 4.0-mg dose of TA, regardless of method used, are variable and inconsistent. Injecting through a small-gauge needle appears to concentrate the remaining suspension. Techniques to concentrate TA or remove aqueous preservatives by filtering effectively increase the concentration, but these results are variable.