Literature DB >> 17011088

Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan.

Joan G Lalor1, Declan Devane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the current provision of pre-ultrasound information to women; to determine if the information provided was related to women's knowledge of the routine second trimester ultrasound; and to describe women's expectations of the scan.
DESIGN: A descriptive survey, before and after design.
SETTING: Tertiary referral centre in the Republic of Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of pregnant women attending for routine second trimester ultrasound scan. MEASUREMENTS: Self-report questionnaires were used to explore the availability of information about the test, the extent of women's knowledge and expectations of the examination, and the degree to which expectations were achieved.
FINDINGS: Most women received little information from health professionals about the capability and limitations of the scan, and had expectations that exceeded the purpose and ability of the examination. Most women, however, stated that their expectations were met in most cases. Although the routine ultrasound in the study site is not a targeted fetal anatomical survey, most women were concerned with this aspect of the test. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: If women are to have realistic expectations of the routine ultrasound scan, then improvements are required in the provision of pre-ultrasound information, particularly in relation to the technological limitations of the examination. Consideration should be given to the context of the high appeal associated with visualising the fetus for women when unachievable expectations are reported as having been met. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Any development of prenatal screening programmes that will uncover fetal abnormalities needs to be considered in context, in particular when termination of pregnancy is not available within the jurisdiction. Women had expectations of the examination that could not, because of technological limitations, have been met by the examination, but which they perceived to have been met. Knowledge of the purpose, capabilities and limitations of the routine second trimester ultrasound scan was not influenced by the mode of information provision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17011088     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

2.  Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Fiona A Lynn; Grainne E Crealey; Fiona A Alderdice; James C McElnay
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Current knowledge, attitudes and practices of expectant women toward routine sonography in pregnancy at Naguru health centre, Uganda.

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Businge Francis; Byanyima Rosemary
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2009-11-30

Review 4.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; Clare Mullan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-14

5.  Attitude of expectant mothers on the use of ultrasound in pregnancy in a tertiary institution in South East of Nigeria.

Authors:  Lc Ikeako; Hu Ezegwui; E Onwudiwe; Jo Enwereji
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-11

6.  'Ultrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can't see everything': a qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Margareta Persson; Ann Lalos; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  When fetal hydronephrosis is suspected antenatally--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marie Oscarsson; Tomas Gottvall; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Quality of consumer-oriented websites containing information about the second trimester ultrasound examination during pregnancy.

Authors:  Susanne Georgsson; Tommy Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Clients' reasons for prenatal ultrasonography in Ibadan, South West of Nigeria.

Authors:  Christopher A Enakpene; Imran O Morhason-Bello; Anthony O Marinho; Babatunde O Adedokun; Adegoke O Kalejaiye; Kayode Sogo; Sikiru A Gbadamosi; Babatunde S Awoyinka; Obehi O Enabor
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Two sides of the same coin--an interview study of Swedish obstetricians' experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management.

Authors:  Annika Åhman; Margareta Persson; Kristina Edvardsson; Ann Lalos; Sophie Graner; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.