Literature DB >> 17010998

Benthic biodiversity indices versus salinity gradient in the southern Baltic Sea.

Michael L Zettler1, Doris Schiedek, Bernd Bobertz.   

Abstract

The need to assess the environmental status of marine and coastal waters according to the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) encouraged the design of specific biotic indices to evaluate the response of benthic communities to human-induced changes in water quality. In the present study three of these indices, the traditional Shannon Wiener Index (H') and the more recently published AMBI (AZTI' Marine Biotic Index) and BQI (Benthic Quality Index), were tested along a salinity gradient in the southern Baltic Sea. The comparison of the three indices demonstrates that in the southern Baltic Sea the ecological quality (EcoQ) classification based on macrozoobenthic communities as indicator greatly depends on the biotic index chosen. We found a significant positive relation between species number, H', BQI and salinity resulting in EcoQ status of "Bad", "Poor" or "Moderate" in areas with a salinity value below 10 psu. The AMBI was less dependent on salinity but appear to partly overestimate the EcoQ status. Presently none of these biotic indices appear to be adjusted for application in a gradient system as given in the southern Baltic Sea. A potential approach describing how to overcome this limitation is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17010998     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  8 in total

1.  Sediment quality assessment in the Gulf of Gdańsk (Baltic Sea) using complementary lines of evidence.

Authors:  Roberta Bettinetti; Silvana Galassi; Jerzy Falandysz; Marina Camusso; Davide A L Vignati
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Ecological quality status evaluation of a monsoonal tropical estuary using benthic indices: comparison via a seasonal approach.

Authors:  Heidy Q Dias; Soniya Sukumaran; Tatiparthi Srinivas; Jyoti Mulik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Macrobenthos response to sewage pollution in a tropical inshore area.

Authors:  T Ganesh; M Rakhesh; A V Raman; Sateesh Nanduri; Shonda Moore; B Rajanna
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Microbial Communities in Biocrusts Are Recruited From the Neighboring Sand at Coastal Dunes Along the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Karin Glaser; Ahn Tu Van; Ekaterina Pushkareva; Israel Barrantes; Ulf Karsten
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Local adaptation and oceanographic connectivity patterns explain genetic differentiation of a marine diatom across the North Sea-Baltic Sea salinity gradient.

Authors:  C Sjöqvist; A Godhe; P R Jonsson; L Sundqvist; A Kremp
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Effects of salinity on nest-building behaviour in a marine fish.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen; Bob B M Wong; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Spatially Explicit Analysis of Genome-Wide SNPs Detects Subtle Population Structure in a Mobile Marine Mammal, the Harbor Porpoise.

Authors:  Ljerka Lah; Daronja Trense; Harald Benke; Per Berggren; Þorvaldur Gunnlaugsson; Christina Lockyer; Ayaka Öztürk; Bayram Öztürk; Iwona Pawliczka; Anna Roos; Ursula Siebert; Krzysztof Skóra; Gísli Víkingsson; Ralph Tiedemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  On the myths of indicator species: issues and further consideration in the use of static concepts for ecological applications.

Authors:  Michael L Zettler; C Edward Proffitt; Alexander Darr; Steven Degraer; Lisa Devriese; Clare Greathead; Jonne Kotta; Paolo Magni; Georg Martin; Henning Reiss; Jeroen Speybroeck; Davide Tagliapietra; Gert Van Hoey; Tom Ysebaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.