Literature DB >> 17010906

Is PET-based treatment planning the new standard in modern radiotherapy? The head and neck paradigm.

Vincent Grégoire1, Anne Bol, Xavier Geets, John Lee.   

Abstract

The use of positron-emission tomography (PET) in the treatment planning process has become more and more popular over the years, although important questions such as how, when, and for which clinical benefit have never been answered. In this framework, the objective of this article is to review the evidence supporting the use of PET in radiotherapy treatment planning, with special emphasis on its application for head and neck tumors. The use of positron-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose for target volume selection should be discussed in terms of sensitivity and specificity in comparison with typical anatomic imaging modalities. It will not be of similar utility across all tumor sites. The use of PET for target volume delineation requires specific tuning of parameters such as image acquisition, processing, and segmentation, and this may vary from one tumor site to another. Molecular imaging with other tracers and "theragnostic" are in the pipeline, but how much the patient will gain from it and how these advances should be implemented in routine clinical practice are unresolved questions. Therefore, although integration of PET images into the radiotherapy process seems promising, for the moment it should remain in the research arena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17010906     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  10 in total

1.  Delineation of FDG-PET tumors from heterogeneous background using spectral clustering.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  On the impact of functional imaging accuracy on selective boosting IMRT.

Authors:  Y Kim; W A Tomé
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET metabolic parameters in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Adam A Garsa; Albert J Chang; Todd Dewees; Christopher R Spencer; Douglas R Adkins; Farrokh Dehdashti; Hiram A Gay; Wade L Thorstad
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-03

Review 4.  Application of metabolic PET imaging in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Aizhi Zhu; David M Marcus; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Validation of functional imaging as a biomarker for radiation treatment response.

Authors:  C Jentsch; B Beuthien-Baumann; E G C Troost; G Shakirin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Cancer-associated stroma affects FDG uptake in experimental carcinomas. Implications for FDG-PET delineation of radiotherapy target.

Authors:  Paolo Farace; Daniela D'Ambrosio; Flavia Merigo; Mirco Galiè; Cristina Nanni; Antonello Spinelli; Stefano Fanti; Anna Degrassi; Andrea Sbarbati; Domenico Rubello; Pasquina Marzola
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Staging of untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT: comparison with conventional imaging work-up.

Authors:  Shu-Hang Ng; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Tzu-Chen Yen; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Chun-Ta Liao; Sheung-Fat Ko; Feng-Yuan Liu; Shu-Chyn Chin; Kang-Hsing Fan; Cheng-Lung Hsu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Long-term surgical complications in the oral cancer patient: a comprehensive review. Part I.

Authors:  Antonia Kolokythas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-10-01

9.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for early detection of tumoral changes in single-dose and fractionated radiotherapy: evaluation in a rat rhabdomyosarcoma model.

Authors:  F De Keyzer; V Vandecaveye; H Thoeny; F Chen; Y Ni; G Marchal; R Hermans; S Nuyts; W Landuyt; H Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Targeted molecular imaging in oncology: focus on radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sridhar Nimmagadda; Eric C Ford; John W Wong; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.934

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.