BACKGROUND: Impairments in decision making are a consistent finding in substance use disorder (SUD) populations. However, decision-making deficits are not specific for SUDs and are also reported in the context of other psychiatric disorders such as antisocial and borderline personality disorders (PDs). Given the frequent comorbidity between SUD and cluster B PD, it might be questioned whether the decision-making impairments typically reported in SUD populations reflect the addictive disorder, the cluster B PD, or a combination of the 2. METHODS: In the current study, we compare the decision-making performance of non-substance-abusing controls (n=53) on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) with the decision-making performance of 3 abstinent alcohol-dependent samples, i.e., alcoholic patients without any PD (n=38), alcoholic patients with a cluster A or C PD (n=19), and alcoholic patients with a cluster B PD (n=23). RESULTS: Overall, all 3 alcohol-dependent subsamples performed inferior compared with controls. Between alcoholic subsamples, the alcoholic patients with a cluster A or C PD had the highest IGT score, followed by the alcoholic patients without a PD, while the cluster B alcoholic patients were the most impaired. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that impairments in decision making underlie both alcohol dependence and cluster B PD, and alcoholic patients with a comorbid cluster B PD are particularly impaired in their decision making. These deficits may underlie the severe problems that characterize cluster B alcoholic patients specifically in inappropriate behaviors (e.g., poly substance abuse, legal, and professional dysfunction).
BACKGROUND: Impairments in decision making are a consistent finding in substance use disorder (SUD) populations. However, decision-making deficits are not specific for SUDs and are also reported in the context of other psychiatric disorders such as antisocial and borderline personality disorders (PDs). Given the frequent comorbidity between SUD and cluster B PD, it might be questioned whether the decision-making impairments typically reported in SUD populations reflect the addictive disorder, the cluster B PD, or a combination of the 2. METHODS: In the current study, we compare the decision-making performance of non-substance-abusing controls (n=53) on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) with the decision-making performance of 3 abstinent alcohol-dependent samples, i.e., alcoholicpatients without any PD (n=38), alcoholicpatients with a cluster A or C PD (n=19), and alcoholicpatients with a cluster B PD (n=23). RESULTS: Overall, all 3 alcohol-dependent subsamples performed inferior compared with controls. Between alcoholic subsamples, the alcoholicpatients with a cluster A or C PD had the highest IGT score, followed by the alcoholicpatients without a PD, while the cluster B alcoholicpatients were the most impaired. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that impairments in decision making underlie both alcohol dependence and cluster B PD, and alcoholicpatients with a comorbid cluster B PD are particularly impaired in their decision making. These deficits may underlie the severe problems that characterize cluster B alcoholicpatients specifically in inappropriate behaviors (e.g., poly substance abuse, legal, and professional dysfunction).
Authors: Jodi M Gilman; Ashley R Smith; James M Bjork; Vijay A Ramchandani; Reza Momenan; Daniel W Hommer Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: L Joos; A E Goudriaan; L Schmaal; N A J De Witte; W Van den Brink; B G C Sabbe; G Dom Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Robert Miranda; James MacKillop; Lori A Meyerson; Alicia Justus; William R Lovallo Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Natalia Albein-Urios; José Miguel Martínez-González; Oscar Lozano; Antonio Verdejo-Garcia Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 4.530