Literature DB >> 17009889

A comparison of reproductive characteristics of boars generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer to highly related conventionally produced boars.

N E Williams1, S C Walker, D E Reeves, E Sherrer, J M Galvin, I Polejaeva, G Rampacek, L Benyshek, R K Christenson, W M Graves, S L Pratt.   

Abstract

This study compares the reproductive performance of boars produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer versus conventional breeding. Two different genotypes were selected for comparison: terminal cross line 1 (TX1) and terminal cross line 2 (TX2). The boars selected for comparison from TX1 were three cloned boars, produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer and the conventionally produced progenitor of the clones. The boars selected for comparison from TX2 were a cloned boar produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer and two conventionally produced half sibling boars that were offspring of the progenitor of the clone. Semen from each boar was collected, extended, evaluated and shipped offsite. Upon arrival, the semen was reevaluated and utilized for artificial insemination of 89 commercial gilts, at least 12 gilts per boar, producing 625 piglets. Pregnancy rates were determined at day 30 and 110 of gestation; and farrowing rate and gestation length were recorded. Differences were observed in some of the semen characteristics analyzed with the clones usually possessing superior semen quality to the control, this likely being a result of age differences amongst the clones and controls. Additionally no differences were noted between the clones and controls (progenitor) or between individual boars within genetic line for pregnancy rates, gestation length or any of the litter parameters examined between the clones and controls. These data further support previous reports with limited numbers that the reproductive capabilities of cloned boars are equal to that of conventionally produced boars.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17009889     DOI: 10.1089/clo.2006.8.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells        ISSN: 1536-2302


  5 in total

1.  Longitudinal study of reproductive performance of female cattle produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Irina A Polejaeva; Diane M Broek; Shawn C Walker; Wenli Zhou; Mark Walton; Abby D Benninghoff; David C Faber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Cloning of breeding buffalo bulls in India: Initiatives & challenges.

Authors:  Naresh L Selokar
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Growth, reproductive performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality in F1 and F2 progenies of somatic cell-cloned pigs.

Authors:  Noritaka Adachi; Daisuke Yamaguchi; Akiyuki Watanabe; Narumi Miura; Seiji Sunaga; Hitoshi Oishi; Michiko Hashimoto; Takatsugu Oishi; Masaki Iwamoto; Hirofumi Hanada; Masanori Kubo; Akira Onishi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Ovulation Statuses of Surrogate Gilts Are Associated with the Efficiency of Excellent Pig Cloning.

Authors:  Yanjun Huan; Kui Hu; Bingteng Xie; Yongqian Shi; Feng Wang; Yang Zhou; Shichao Liu; Bo Huang; Jiang Zhu; Zhongfeng Liu; Yilong He; Jingyu Li; Qingran Kong; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Successful cloning of a superior buffalo bull.

Authors:  Naresh L Selokar; Papori Sharma; Monika Saini; Suman Sheoran; Rasika Rajendran; Dharmendra Kumar; Rakesh Kumar Sharma; Rajender K Motiani; Pradeep Kumar; A Jerome; Sudhir Khanna; Prem Singh Yadav
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.