Literature DB >> 17009255

A prospective population-based study of the predictors of undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

Gillian A Hawker1, Jun Guan, Ruth Croxford, Peter C Coyte, Richard H Glazier, Bart J Harvey, James G Wright, Jack I Williams, Elizabeth M Badley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine prospectively the predictors of time to total joint arthroplasty (TJA).
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study with a median followup time of 6.1 years. We included participants from an existing population-based cohort of 2,128 individuals, ages 55 years and older with disabling hip and/or knee arthritis and no prior TJA, from 2 regions of Ontario, Canada, 1 urban with low TJA rates and 1 rural with high rates. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of a TJA based on procedure codes in the hospital discharge abstract database.
RESULTS: At baseline, the mean age of the patients was 71.5 years, 67.9% had a high school education or higher, 73.4% were women, the mean arthritis severity (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) score was 41.1 (maximum possible score 100), and 20.0% were willing to consider TJA. Greater probability of undergoing TJA was associated with higher (worse) baseline WOMAC scores (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22 per 10-unit increase, P < 0.001), age (compared with age <or=62 years, the HR increased to 1.57 for 63-68 years, 1.46 for 69-74 years, and 1.51 for 75-81 years, and fell to 0.44 for >or=82 years; P < 0.05 for all), better health (HR 1.14 per 10-unit increase in Short Form 36 general health survey score, P < 0.001), and willingness to consider TJA (HR 4.92, P < 0.001). When willingness was excluded from the model, education level, but not sex or income, became a significant predictor of TJA receipt.
CONCLUSION: Willingness to consider TJA was the strongest predictor of the time to first TJA. Given that previous research indicates that willingness is largely explained by perceptions of the indications for and risks associated with TJA and not disease severity, this finding supports the need for population education about arthritis treatments, including TJA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17009255     DOI: 10.1002/art.22146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  69 in total

1.  Consistency of knee pain and risk of knee replacement: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  Barton L Wise; David T Felson; Margaret Clancy; Jingbo Niu; Tuhina Neogi; Nancy E Lane; Jean Hietpas; Jeffrey R Curtis; Laurence A Bradley; James C Torner; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Relationship Between Knee Pain and Patient Preferences for Joint Replacement: Health Care Access Matters.

Authors:  Ernest R Vina; Di Ran; Erin L Ashbeck; Manjinder Kaur; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  The role of pain and functional impairment in the decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1909 patients. Report of the OARSI-OMERACT Task Force on total joint replacement.

Authors:  L Gossec; S Paternotte; J F Maillefert; C Combescure; P G Conaghan; A M Davis; K-P Gunther; G Hawker; M Hochberg; J N Katz; M Kloppenburg; K Lim; L S Lohmander; N N Mahomed; L March; K Pavelka; L Punzi; E M Roos; L Sanchez-Riera; J A Singh; M E Suarez-Almazor; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Lysophosphatidylcholines to phosphatidylcholines ratio predicts advanced knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Weidong Zhang; Guang Sun; Dawn Aitken; Sergei Likhodii; Ming Liu; Glynn Martin; Andrew Furey; Edward Randell; Proton Rahman; Graeme Jones; Guangju Zhai
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 5.  Drivers of surgery for the degenerative hip, knee, and spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Charles D Rosen; Nitin N Bhatia; P Douglas Kiester; Ranjan Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Mapping the Diffusion of Technology in Orthopaedic Surgery: Understanding the Spread of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Michael T Torchia; Jonathan D Lurie; David S Jevsevar; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Trends and regional variation in rates of orthopaedic surgery in Germany: the impact of competition.

Authors:  Natalie Baier; Lisa-Marie Sax; Leonie Sundmacher
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-07-02

8.  Clinical appropriateness and not race predicted referral for joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dennis C Ang; Golda James; Timothy E Stump
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12-15

9.  Social determinants and osteoarthritis outcomes.

Authors:  My-Linh N Luong; Rebecca J Cleveland; Kirsten A Nyrop; Leigh F Callahan
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2012-08-01

10.  Clinical predictors of elective total joint replacement in persons with end-stage knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joseph A Zeni; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.