Literature DB >> 17009046

Stimulus and response repetition effects in the detection of sounds: evidence of obligatory retrieval and use of a prior event.

Todd A Mondor1, Launa C Leboe.   

Abstract

Three experiments were performed to examine the extent to which the time required to detect a probe sound is determined by the acoustic characteristics of a preceding prime sound and by the nature of the response made to the prime. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that the effect of frequency repetition was facilitative when a response was made to the occurrence of both the prime and the probe, but was inhibitory when a response was made only to the probe. In contrast, there was no significant effect of location repetition when responses were made to both prime and probe but there was a strongly inhibitory effect when a response was required only to the probe. These results suggest that the acoustic characteristics of the prime along with information about any response made to it, are used in preparing and executing a response to the probe. Experiment 2 was designed to disrupt the temporal link between prime and probe as a way to discourage such retrieval. The results of the experiment revealed that although a response was required to both the prime and probe, no significant effect of frequency repetition was apparent but a robust inhibitory effect of location repetition emerged. In the third experiment repetition effects both within a trial (i.e., prime to probe) and between trials (i.e., probe to prime) were examined. A facilitative effect of frequency repetition was apparent when the interval between sounds was brief, and an inhibitory effect of location repetition was apparent when the interval between sounds was relatively lengthy. Taken together these results suggest that even simple perceptual judgments may be influenced by retrieval of information about a previous processing episode and that effects of frequency repetition and location repetition may be mediated by different mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17009046     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0095-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  12 in total

1.  Facilitative and inhibitory effects of location and frequency cues: evidence of a modulation in perceptual sensitivity.

Authors:  T A Mondor; L M Breau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-04

2.  Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.

Authors:  W T Neill; L A Valdes; K M Terry; D S Gorfein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Auditory frequency-based inhibition differs from spatial IOR.

Authors:  David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

4.  Categorizing sounds by pitch: effects of stimulus similarity and response repetition.

Authors:  Todd A Mondor; Jennifer Hurlburt; Leslie Thorne
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

5.  How much attention does an event file need?

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: evidence of location-based and frequency-based inhibition of return.

Authors:  T A Mondor; L M Breau; B Milliken
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-02

7.  Focused auditory attention and frequency selectivity.

Authors:  B Scharf; S Quigley; C Aoki; N Peachey; A Reeves
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

8.  Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal method.

Authors:  G Z Greenberg; W D Larkin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition.

Authors:  P Bertelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue.

Authors:  J L Craft; J R Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-03
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Auditory distractor processing in sequential selection tasks.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Birte Moeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-21

2.  Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.