Literature DB >> 17008699

Do patients with localized prostate cancer treatment really want more aggressive treatment?

Julia J van Tol-Geerdink1, Peep F M Stalmeier, Emile N J T van Lin, Eric C Schimmel, Henk Huizenga, Wim A J van Daal, Jan-Willem Leer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Examine whether patients with prostate cancer choose the more aggressive of two radiotherapeutic options, whether this choice is reasoned, and what the determinants of the choice are. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with primary prostate cancer (T(1-3)N(0)M(0)) were informed by means of a decision aid of two treatment options: radiotherapy with 70 Gy versus 74 Gy. The latter treatment is associated with more cure and more toxicity. The patients were asked whether they wanted to choose, and if so which treatment they preferred. They also assigned importance weights to the probability of various outcomes, such as survival, cure and adverse effects. Patients who wanted to choose their own treatment (n = 119) are described here.
RESULTS: The majority of these patients (75%) chose the lower radiation dose. Their choice was highly consistent (P < or = .001), with the importance weights assigned to the probability of survival, cure (odds ratio [OR] = 6.7 and 6.9) and late GI and genitourinary adverse effects (OR = 0.1 and 0.2). The lower dose was chosen more often by the older patients, low-risk patients, patients without hormone treatment, and patients with a low anxiety or depression score.
CONCLUSION: Most patients with localized prostate cancer prefer the lower radiation dose. Our findings indicate that many patients attach more weight to specific quality-of-life aspects (eg, GI toxicity) than to improving survival. Treatment preferences of patients with localized prostate cancer can and should be involved in radiotherapy decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17008699     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

Review 1.  Older adults and cancer treatment.

Authors:  Barbara Given; Charles W Given
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  [Shared decision-making in prostate cancer patients].

Authors:  S Gröger; C Mäder-Porombka; C Stang; S Wallacher
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Treatment of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review of interactive, personalized patient decision aids].

Authors:  C Groeben; J C Streuli; T Krones; B Keck; M P Wirth; J Huber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Development of a scale to assess patient misperceptions about treatment choices for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; Ravinder Mohan; May A Beydoun; John Davis; Raymond Lance; Paul Schellhammer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences: an application in oncology.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Anne M Stiggelbout; Corrie A M Marijnen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  [Elderly prostate cancer patients: patient information and shared decision making].

Authors:  N Ernstmann; J Jaeger; C Kowalski; H Pfaff; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Paul Sinfield; Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Andrew M Colman; Carolyn Tarrant; John K Mellon; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh; Shona Agarwal
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Does radical treatment have a role in the management of low-risk prostate cancer? The place for brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Scott G Williams; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Prevalence of pain and analgesic use in men with metastatic prostate cancer using a patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Karen A Autio; Antonia V Bennett; Xiaoyu Jia; Michael Fruscione; Tomasz M Beer; Daniel J George; Michael A Carducci; Christopher J Logothetis; Robert C Kane; Laura Sit; Lauren Rogak; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Ethan M Basch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.